[–] onion2k 8y ago ↗ Not really. [–] articlespub 8y ago ↗ Thank you for your genuine reply.Also, Huge fan of your work sir :) ooer.com
[–] articlespub 8y ago ↗ Thank you for your genuine reply.Also, Huge fan of your work sir :) ooer.com
[–] stephenr 8y ago ↗ I make/buy nice food to eat it, not to take pictures of it and share with 8 billion strangers.So that's a no, if it wasn't obvious. [–] [deleted] 8y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] jerrre 8y ago ↗ If there is no difference, there is no reason. What would be the difference? [–] articlespub 8y ago ↗ Nothing except you can add few more filters, basic image manipulation and add links to the photos.
[–] articlespub 8y ago ↗ Nothing except you can add few more filters, basic image manipulation and add links to the photos.
[–] sky_projektor 8y ago ↗ Photographs are objects of past. Yes, if the alternative allows me to do what best describes as the recording of the present age & share to all users.
7 comments
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 52.9 ms ] threadAlso, Huge fan of your work sir :) ooer.com
So that's a no, if it wasn't obvious.