126 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 139 ms ] thread
Super reasonable cost, looks easier than dealing with my own Jekyll or something similar. Plan on giving this a spin!
If you use a static site generator like Jekyll, you can host a site for free on github pages.

(Blot looks as easy to use as other static site generators)

I signed up for this the other day and so far really love it. Write a markdown/text file in Dropbox and within 30 seconds or so it's published as a nicely-rendered blog post. As someone who used Jekyll for years and got tired of running hosting and doing rsyncs etc, this is really nice for personal blogging.

The usability of the blot.im site itself is a bit lacking. You get a totally different UI when you're logged in, and the links to documentation on how to format your posts and what the different dropbox folders mean are gone. I had to open an Incognito window to find the documentation (spoiler: https://blot.im/help). The service is dead-simple to use and supports a wide variety of posting styles and formats.

Glad to hear you like it so far. I’m working on a redesign of the dashboard to bring it in line with the front-facing site. I know it’s not good enough as it is and I promise it’ll be fixed.

p.s. I recently added support for git if you’d rather not use Dropbox (https://twitter.com/Blot__/status/996506149712211968). And as a point of trivia, Blot launched just under four years ago here on HN in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8183498

(comment deleted)
Thanks for posting the link to the previous thread. And congratulations! Blot is a marvel in simplicity.
If you like Jekyll, GitHub pages has first class support for it. All you have to do is commit a new file for github pages to rebuild your site.
GitLab Pages is only slightly more involved in the setup but the end result is the same, with the added bonus that you can completely customise the pipeline, including not using Jekyll but e.g Hugo (sample[0]) or whatever else you fancy as a generator.

[0]: https://gitlab.com/pages/hugo

That's how medium started. And look where that got us.
I switched to using Netlify for Jekyll. So much easier. Just push to github and it'll build and update the site. It also handles Let's Encrypt.
"no interface" is nice marketing, but of course there still is an interface. It just happens to be different from what we usually think of as an interface, but documents placed in Dropbox is still an interface.
It's dead simple, but you're right everything has an interface. Still I love how simple it is.
Definitely not bashing the simplicity. It's not a product for me, but I can certainly imagine this would be a great solution for many.
a simple blogging site — i never found anything more minimal than this.

http://adombic.appspot.com/

I don’t expect anyone to use it, just wanted to show for fun since we are talking about simplicity :)

No separate interface of its own. You use your existing tools.
502, Deathhug.
Should be fixed now. One of the servers went down and was struggling to restart under the increased load.
You can actually use

    http://ix.io
for blogging too.
One bonus which isn't obvious on the website: the code's open source [1], and released under the CC0 licence.

[1] https://github.com/davidmerfield/Blot

Doesnt Creative Commons actively discourage the use of their licenses for code? I seem to recall seeing something to that effect on their website.
CC0 is a special case, it's a release into the public domain, plus a fully permissive license for countries where you can't release into the PD.
Cool, thanks. This seemed like a good service, but I want to run the daemon myself (and not pay $20).

I’ll contribute to the project or figure out some way to get money to the project team if I like it.

$20 per YEAR

Just a note for others who see this comment as high up as I did.

Honestly, unless it would take you less than half an hour per year on average to do whatever you want with the source code, I think buying it is the more economical option.
Perhaps I could spend more than half an hour to save others the time.

The beauty of software having a near zero marginal cost is that it only take one person to volunteer their time.

Fantastic, so simple and powerful. Great work.
No affiliation but all of my email exchanges with the creator have been surprisingly helpful and pleasant.
This is a good idea, could be really popular with semi-technical users.
This is really cool but it kinda sucks that it's tied to Dropbox - I would like to be able to do something like point it at a git repo URL instead.

Off topic: it would be really nice if there was a common open API for file sync/share services like Dropbox.

My first thought was the same.

My second thought was: github and Gitlab both have pages which will do this for you.

This is even easier for people who want to do less.

Blot recently added support for git, I just haven’t updated the homepage to reflect this:

https://twitter.com/Blot__/status/996506149712211968

While you are updating things. I think it would be good to re-enable the YouTube controls-bar on the video. I had to drop out of your site and go to YouTube directly, to be able to watch the video on mute with closed captioning.
Have fixed this, not sure what I was thinking.
Take a look at my https://sitios.xyz/ (the interface is very rough yet, but I'm slowly integrating more stuff and making everything better).
dmerfield posted below he recently added support for git. His comment has details and a link.
It would be nice, but in the meantime I keep recommending people to use SyncThing. It has become much easier to set up and it works brilliantly.
I mean, Dropbox is basically a nice front end to Amazon S3 - and doing S3 yourself by hand isn't much cheaper than paid Dropbox (or wasn't when I looked a few months ago).

But I am actually surprised I couldn't quickly find a DIY-Dropbox project.

PSA: You can run Wordpress headlessly, there are libraries in a few languages which consume its API to help you render how you want.

You can hate PHP but Wordpress is king for non-technical users.

There are also plugins that generate a static version of WordPress, so you can run it locally as a site generator and deploy static files anywhere you like.

Agreed on WordPress. In fact, I'm about to start working on the second edition of my book, Technical Blogging, and I will still recommend WordPress despite my audience being highly technical. (Of course, I'll discuss the alternatives as well.)

I'm much more likely to continue to update a site in my spare time if it's a static site on a managed service than if I have to keep on top of security updates for a web server and a CMS and a backing database and the operating system(s) underneath it all. It's just too much administration for something I mildly enjoy doing in the first place.

But your insistence that Wordpress (possibly as a static gen) is worth it has me interested. Where would you recommend I pick up a DRM-free copy of the first edition?

> I'm about to start working on the second edition of my book, Technical Blogging

Great news!

I read your book in (I think 2012), and found it very useful.

I suspect I'll be buying the second edition.

Awesome. Thank you for your kind words. A lot has changed in 6 years and I learned much more as well. I'll ensure it's a worthwhile upgrade for those who read the first edition as well.
> You can hate PHP but Wordpress is king for non-technical users.

What if I enjoy using PHP, am very technical, hate Wordpress and my users tell me it's too hard? :D

This seems to more accurately represent the reality of the situation in my experience.
One cannot not communicate. One cannot not design.

Dropbox is the interface in this case.

Octopress is similar to this for google drive but I don't think its been updated in years - no support for custom domains, themes, etc but the idea is great.

http://octopress.org/

I seem to recall Dropbox-powered static blog generators being all the rage a few years back...then they all shut down.
$20 per year seems steep enough to count as outrageous. Especially when compared to other hosted blog options like WordPress, Blogger, Livejournal, Tumblr, etc. Heck, if I get a free ".tk" website, with maybe free 5GB web hosting with WP.org installed and a free 5GB CDN from Cloudinary, I can "self-host" WordPress for free.

So am I missing a major value-add over any of the above options that makes the $20 a reasonable cost?

This dev created a service that is hosted by himself. There is no "steep" in $20 if you think about server costs and support. Heck, think about how less $20 is, in terms of a whole year! I don't know this guy and I don't need his service but I'm sorry for him that our "every must be cheap or free" dev-culture will make his product less attractive by not making the customer to the product instead.
> I can "self-host" WordPress for free.

If your time is worth nothing

You are not paying for the hosting, but for the convenience.
Okay, but then I have to ask - how is this more convenient than Wordpress.com or Tumblr?
It's cleaner, you have version controlled dropbox files, edit seamlessly on your computer using any editor. All the pain points/features are listed on the site.
This looks really nice. Elegantly simple, and very reasonably priced. I could easily see Blot carving out a niche with customers for whom the likes of Squarespace or Wix is total overkill.
Please add an option to pay with Paypal or Stripe Checkout.

I don't think I am the only person who is uncomfortable typing in my credit card details on various website, even if you're using Strip APIs.

The website's design doesn't work well on mobile (just trying to be helpful).
How is that different than any other static website generator that started way back with Blosxom and has now grown to a dozens of different generators?

Github pages is also really simple to use, unless you have problems with git.

I couldn't find an easy way to edit textfiles stored on github from my iPhone or iPad.

But if you use Dropbox, there are several apps that were made specifically to write posts and content in Markdown. When you tap into the Dropbox ecosystem, you gain a lot in ease of use.

https://getkirby.com/ is a a good file-based CMS too that might be of interest to people looking at this.
The attraction of Blot appears to be that it's not a CMS. It has no GUI, just drag-and-drop into Dropbox synced folders.
It looks like all the blogusername.blot.im blogs get no https, as opposed to the main blot.im site/page.
I recently got a gemini PDA, and i started to look at blogging on this thing. (basically android phone with physical keyboard)

Two biggest contenders were wordpress and blogger. I don't want a cms for my blog so blogger made sense, unfortunately it's tied up to google.

Ghost seems compelling, but 20$/month or 5-10$ on other hosting companies is too much, i won't spend hundred(s) every year on my blog. For now at least.

There is markdown editors on F-droid, and static site generators are viable.

I will definitely look into Blot.

Blot is actually only $20/y so 12 times cheaper than ghost. Also be aware that you can get free hosting using github pages, or netlify.
How have I never heard of this Gemini PA!?! I took a look and it really seems awesome! It's a tad pricey (I'm referring to the model with wifi only at $499 USD)...but admittedly I am a cheapskate, and I'm sure prices will go down with increased adoption, economies of scale, etc. ;-) Nevertheless, it really seems to be an amazing form factor. I could absolutely see this as being my laptop for the road. Thanks for sharing this!
Yeah I'm also pretty stoked about this thing, if only it weren't so pricy.