Ask HN: Why are submissions staying on the front page for longer?
I've noticed over the last few months that things submitted to HN that reach the front page have been staying there for a day or two. It seems (maybe it is just my perception) that a year ago a submission would only stay on the front page for a few hours and at max a day. Am I imagining things? If I'm not imagining it, what is causing things to stay on the front page? An influx of users, maybe?
44 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 74.1 ms ] threadThis got sensibly flagged off. If you want to know, ask the mods. If something super-interesting has changed, you can always write a thing about it and post it and see how it fares.
I guess anything Ruby is old news on HN
I find that trivially true statement, or those that seeming to appeal to our values / beliefs, get a lot of upvotes without people even following the link, let alone contributing thoughtful comments. Whereas I come to HN to read insightful comments almost more than underlying articles - I find it fascinating when an Apollo engineer or a ML researcher or a physicist etc contribute their perspective on a topic :)
I understand the idea behind it, but I don't think it works very well in practice. It works sometimes, but I've also seen it kill plenty of posts that were totally fine.
Anecdotally, it has been a safe heuristic. (IIRC it also incorporates comment depth, and the Ruby thread has a lot of deep comments)
Edit: the article seems borderline for HN but the discussion is quite good, so we'll turn the penalty off. It's https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17355187.
There’s definitely some pseudo curation happening, which I like.
Some interesting things I’ve picked up:
- If a submission is interesting but doesn’t get picked up for whatever reason (posted at the wrong time or there was other big news at the time) mods will get in contact with you and ask you to repost.
- More comments than votes seems to sink the article quickly. It’s generally a controversial topic which isn’t engaging and inspiring in the right way.
- there are a number of mod specific flags other than the above that affect the position of articles. From what I remember reading there’s 6 such flags. Would love to know what they are
I’m guessing the algorithm is a sort based on time * points then modifying it based on hidden flags
I usually find the posts that generate more comments than votes to be the most valuable and interesting.
More options can be found at https://news.ycombinator.com/lists
Almost everyday, I see a post from select news sources with 1 or 2 upvotes and no comments very high on the frontpage.
Also, is it just me or has hacker news slowly shifted from being about technology to more politics?
And a final observation, what's with the neverending submissions about facebook?
The nature of tech communities is that we tend to value privacy, so I think perhaps the Facebook issue is pushed here vigorously by zealot-types to try and "win the team" or by agents who have vested interest in seeing Facebook destroyed. It's a bandwagon thing mostly though.
I've noticed this a lot lately as well. I always think, "I wonder how this got to the front page with zero comments, but a ton of upvotes."
Any of those posts seem suspicious to me since the MO for HN seems to be if it's good, it should generate some discussion on its way to the front page. Unless they're trying to circumvent the algorithm that pushes stories with more comments than upvotes?
>> Also, is it just me or has hacker news slowly shifted from being about technology to more politics?
Yes.
I'm seeing more and more political stuff, which is NOT the reason I come here. If I want a political flame war, I can go over to Reddit. TBH, I don't come as often anymore because it seems everything gets turned into something political.
That is not how HN works. Posts start on the "new" page, once they get three upvotes they show up on the front page, then they get more attention and, if there are enough upvotes to make the submission stay, a discussion develops.
If you don't like the topics that show up on HN, try submitting more interesting stories and occasionally check the "new" page to upvote other submissions.
People have been saying this for about as long as HN has existed, but it isn't true. HN is a mix, it's always been a mix, and the proportion of politics in the mix has gone down somewhat. Why do people perceive the opposite? Because of the cognitive bias where whatever you dislike stands out more. The users who wish HN would have more politics believe that the trend is just the opposite way (a la 'political stories are being increasingly suppressed' and so on).
For anyone who wants details, I wrote a detailed post about this a few weeks ago with tons of examples, so I could link back to it when this issue inevitably comes up again. It's here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869.
p.s. There's no special favorable treatment of any publication on HN. We do penalize sites that have been the source of too many off topic or lightweight submissions in the past.
I for one have been finding coming to HN much less rewarding lately. I have to search more pages to find interesting posts.
Placement on the front page is a very finite resource.
There's also the second-chance pool that we put stories into, which get randomly placed on the front page (this is described at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11662380 and links back from there), and the repost invites we occasionally send out when we notice a great post that's more than a few days old.
https://hn.algolia.com/?query=&sort=byPopularity&prefix&page... (it's not working at the moment for some reason)
The "Past Week" view is still working: https://hn.algolia.com/?query=&sort=byPopularity&prefix&page...
HN is for rubes now.