Since he embedd youtube videos like a "youtube service" i'm not sure the logo is the biggest issue here? Or are you allowed to do that? Make a new youtube front?
I'm pretty sure you can embed/aggregate youtube videos, as long as the author allows it, anyway you want. Youtube still makes money off any ads that show up in the video, why do they care where/how people get to the videos, as long as it's still showing advertising? The logo though, could possibly be too similar to youtube's and cause some issues.
Could you reference what part of the ToS they're in violation of? I've got a site that does similar and when I had a look through I couldn't find anything that might put me in hot water
A good way to get around that, and monetize the site would maybe be simply throw up some optin forms/subscribe mechanisms. Build a mailing list, then advertise via newsletter. That'd probably be how I'd monetize the site. That way there'd be no ads on-site, but it could still be commercialized via email.
Is that the correct section? When I click on that, there is no section 5 E, only A, B, C and D. The heading on section 5 here is "5. Your Use of Content".
Edit: It seems to be allowed here. Section 4 E ii, note the double negative in 4 E:
4. General Use of the Service—Permissions and Restrictions
E. Prohibited commercial uses do not include:
* showing YouTube videos through the Embeddable Player on an ad-enabled blog or website, subject to the advertising restrictions set forth above in Section 4.D
Fascinating, thank you. I get completely different terms and conditions when I click on the same link - it includes the text you posted under section 4 D instead, but then adds a clause E specifically allowing use of the Embeddable Player on sites with ads:
there should be a video aggregation service (ironically like a google for video) that'll link/embed videos but also allow for content creation uploading to multiple other video services.
youtube is in decline but it's not happening soon, some videos will disappear from youtube and we still need to save them somehow.
Their unfair treatment of content creators who are less liked by advertisers, as well as their draconian rules instituted recently, as well as changes to the algorithms used to select recommendations, and subscription notification delays have all conflagrated into a massive clusterfuck for many small channels of niche content (where, imho, is the true value of youtube).
I have no doubt that unless this changes, a new competitor that can get enough network effect can eat youtube's lunch...
https://awesometalks.party is a million times better than this site. It's curated, so you don't have to sort through thousands of talks to find the interesting ones - it's only the interesting ones. Also it has a night mode!
https://awesometalks.party is great if you want talks about web-related topics, but there isn't much else (eg there are no talks on C++ or Java, or modern game development, or big data, etc there..). There's definitely room for another dev talks website that covers more subjects.
That's because not enough people have submitted good talks about other topics yet! If you know any, click the "Add a talk" button in the top right and suggest them!
They are allowed to exist by YouTube, provided they don't affect Google in a negative way.
There are constant discussions in the tech community about how we keep the internet free and usable by all. We (developers) should be leading by example and creating services that don't rely on permission from large corporations to operate. Especially when those services are about distributing knowledge.
Claim 1: Google will shut down video aggregation and hosting sites
Counterclaim 1: But what about x, y and z that exist parallel to Youtube?
Claim 2: Those are allowed to exist by Google.
I dont disagree with your overarching point, it just seem like your arguing it in a flawed manner without any real evidence of your claim occurring or explaining why there are other sites that provide similar functionality without being affected by Google?
>We (developers) should be leading by example and creating services that don't rely on permission from large corporations to operate.
Great so that is what the original poster is doing? And your already claiming that Google is going to shut this down. Seems kinda alarmist.
It is alarmist for sure, we absolutely should be alarmed at how little control over content end users have.
YouTube specific examples are hard to come by, but here's something related to how they control their API from wikipedia: "YouTube also does not allow videos to run whilst the Android device is sleeping. This can be seen as an annoyance for some users. Particularly if the user is trying to use YouTube as a replacement music player.[13]"
When you look at the reference for that quote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGoVol6ujHk You get "This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated."
Presumably that original use case was outside of their terms, but why? It's not to help users, it's because it infringes on Google Music and their Ad Partners will not be happy if people are listening to ads instead of watching them. If google could get away with monitoring your phone to check you're watching the ads they put up, I'm sure they would because they could charge 3x the price for them.
If we look at other similar companies that have offered APIs for developers to use in the past we actually do find lots of examples of services that already existing being shut down:
So yes, these apps are only allowed to exist while Google allows it, if there's a squeeze at google they will get shut down. There is no reason not to use different tech given the options we have available today if we want to protect content and respect our users.
Fantastic idea. Last month I've been thinking of creating a list of tech videos shorter than 15 minutes (so it will be only 10 minutes when I play with 1.5 speed) as (from my point of view) it would be easy to watch in a break or commute without losing the attention span :)
If you can add this feature in the filters (filter by duration) it would be great!
An example would be:
<10 minutes
<20 minutes
<30 minutes
Youtube does not have this feature rather they only have short (<4 minutes) and long (>20 minutes)
Hey looks great! I made something very similar https://talkery.io, shoot me a message if you guys need any advice/want some help in getting new videos etc, I'd be happy to help!
Hi! Thanks for raising this. Please submit an issue (https://github.com/watch-devtube/web), so we can fix it. In the meantime, cannot reproduce (Mac, Chrome Desktop 66.0) :(
So, is there such a site for the transcripts for those videos? I'm old fashioned and read much faster than a human can talk, so I don't see the reason to spend 45 min watching a talking head.
Or an edited transcript, with the source code samples copied inline and perhaps a bit more detail than someone would say out loud? Hang on, maybe we could put multiple talks about closely related subjects together with headings to separate them! Then have some sort of table of the subjects at the beginning to make them easy to find - a table of the 'contents' so to speak.
This is a brilliant idea, I'm going to file my patent application now.
I have experience with and equipment for transcription. If this site had the feature to add transcriptions, I would like to transcribe maybe one or two videos per week and I don't think I'm the only one who would. It would be a nice easy way to give back and possibly even garner some reputation/goodwill.
The two most important pieces are a high-quality head-set and a foot-pedal to rewind/fast-forward. After that, a good ergonomic keyboard is very helpful. That's the bulk of it, but you can find other ways to spend money such as specialized software and hardware.
We (Manning Publications) added transcripts as a pretty central feature of our video platform. I'd be pretty interested to hear what you thought. A lot of our customers asked for this when we were researching what they wanted, so I'm always interested to see if people outside our usual user base like what we've done: https://livevideo.manning.com/module/31_1_2/algorithms-in-mo...?
This is excellent — I love the link between the transcript and the video. Being able to click the text and jump to that point in the video works fluidly; I can read ahead and jump to things I want to see explained visually. The presentation of the transcript is also much better than the broken-line-by-line approach that others such as YouTube take: https://d.pr/i/WvrOX5.
This is the perfect combination of ebook and video for me, and I didn't know Manning was doing this. Some minor feedback:
- I wish the transcript text size could be increased without affecting the rest of the UI (which seems fine). Maybe it can and I missed it, or I need to be logged in?
- I see “pause on try its” in the page options (it's checked and disabled) but couldn't find any videos that use this. This feature sounds like it would greatly enhance the learning experience and it should be part of all videos. I learn a lot more when actively trying things than when passively watching and reading, and few online courses combine video and text transcripts with hands-on opportunities well.
I just bought Algorithms in Motion on the back of this experience, though, (plus a couple of books I'd been considering) and am looking forward to going through the whole course.
> - I wish the transcript text size could be increased without affecting the rest of the UI (which seems fine). Maybe it can and I missed it, or I need to be logged in?
Totally agreed we need this. I've passed this feedback onto the developers (I'm in editorial here).
> - I see “pause on try its” in the page options (it's checked and disabled) but couldn't find any videos that use this. This feature sounds like it would greatly enhance the learning experience and it should be part of all videos. I learn a lot more when actively trying things than when passively watching and reading, and few online courses combine video and text transcripts with hands-on opportunities well.
Yep, we're still experimenting with this feature. I think you'll see us using it much, much more in future content.
> Totally agreed we need this. I've passed this feedback onto the developers (I'm in editorial here).
As a customer, I've been seeing the changes they've been doing over the years, and absolutely love the work they've done. At every stage, you can see the attention and care to simple things that make the Manning site a pleasure and the experience better and better. Tell them to keep up the good work.
It's in-house, yes. Interestingly, the original code base was designed to tie book text to audio-book readings, which we use in our liveBook platform. There's various third-party libraries in play for some of it, but other than that we've built it all in-house.
This is super-awesome. Any chance you get all the online course providers (like Coursera) to adopt this ASAP? :) The only thing that is missing there now is the ability to make bookmarks, and have those to be able to reference externally (i.e. go to bookmark by URL) and the thing is very close to perfect. Oh, and maybe also make an option to do horizontal split instead of vertical - since most videos are wider than they are tall you get bigger video with the same split.
>I'm old fashioned and read much faster than a human can talk, so I don't see the reason to spend 45 min watching a talking head.
I agree that people can read at 200+ wpm while most people only talk at ~100 wpm. However, some programming presentations are visually intensive with demonstrations of interactive features. That would be videos such as showing how an IDE works (debugging tips and tricks), CSS transforms, GUI workflow (e.g. navigate AWS admin screens to set up security, auto-scaling, etc). For example, I see that the landing page has severgal Google I/O keynotes and those are always heavy with demos.
But yes, for presentations of static text such as explaining the new syntax for C++11, a "talking head" reading the slides may not add much value and just slow you down.
As for transcripts... Since many videos seem to come from YouTube, it may be possible to download the auto-generated captions.[1] (I don't have a YouTube account so I have no idea how well this works.) I noticed one presentation where a speaker was talking about "Qt" framework but the Youtube's speech recognition auto-captioned it as "cute". I don't know if mistranslation is a rare and minor annoyance or if it makes the transcripts unusable.
To downvoters: please let me know what I wrote that didn't add positive contribution to this discussion.
I wouldn't bother with the automatically generated ones, though. They are not good enough. (Whenever there are real captions, I turn them on to be able to speed up the video beyond the point where I can no longer hear what people say. That's great!)
How can you tell if the captions are real vs auto-generated? Do you mean "real" as in subtitles that are burned into the video source instead of being dynamically overlaid?
I don't mean burnt into the video. The YouTube inteface says "auto-generated" when it is the case (example [0]). Sometimes, though, it seems that uploaders have taken auto-generated captions and added them as if they were manually made, so then YouTube doesn't label it correctly.
Ok, I never noticed that. I just read the captions and assumed obvious misspellings were auto-generated.
For example in this video[1], the caption text is "L1D cache misses" but he's actually saying "L1-dcache misses". (The Linux terminal screen he's showing does display "L1-dcache".) Even though that video is not labeled as "auto-generated", I assumed it was because of the bad caption. Based on your info, I guess CppCon uses humans like Mechanical Turk or other non-domain typists to manually add the captions.
Manual captioning is almost always not done by domain experts, but by people who have some training with a captioning system and work as professional captionists. Their main advantage is that they'll caption much faster and much cheaper than having domain experts do it, but the quality tends to suffer.
In college, I met a deaf guy who always had two women accompany him to lectures; one of them would repeat everything into a mouth-covering microphone to generate an automatic transcription and the other went over it to correct obvious errors. They generated a lot of nonsense, especially when the German professor was using some English loanwords for CS concepts. I was always amazed that the deaf guy still somehow managed to learn something from these garbled transcriptions.
(Re: AWS config) Oh yes, the MCSE books with screenshots of wizards. Those can be done as a video, or condensed 100:1 if you give up on the screenshots and just write the option names. All admin interfaces that I've been in had text descriptions for every element, you just need to read them.
>Oh yes, the MCSE books with screenshots of wizards.
Yes, I get the point that many books have gratuitous screen shots to pad the page count. But that's a separate issue from the idea that some videos don't translate well to transcripts.
>had text descriptions for every element, you just need to read them.
Sure, I understand the value of reading. However, sometimes a presenter showing a live demo will wiggle the mouse cursor around certain options on the screen to emphasize particular things or clarify what may be confusing with a list of check boxes. ("You want to click this; you don't want to click that.") Or maybe demonstrate clicking on a setting and then immediately show the system dashboard statistics changing in realtime as a response. That combination of dynamic "spatial"+"time" to convey technical information is the value of live demos over reading man pages.
The videos are not replacements for concise reference texts but a supplementary teaching tool.
Here's an example of a video demonstrating high interaction with tools that would be very cumbersome to put into text:
Lots of of mouse of movement to guide where the eye should look. Lots of scrolling and zooming. Voice annotation that's synchronized with the screen data that's constantly changing. It wouldn't translate well to text. Even if one manually created an accurate text transcript of that talk, all the missing visual cues would inhibit learning how to "drive" the tool like a car. Transcripts are only a reasonable substitute for some types of tech talks.
Youtube Playback Speed Control Extension works well here... and I can watch it im my comfort zone of 3.5x - 4.5x. So at least 45min get cut to 10-15min..
but tested only on one so far.
Nicely done, I've always heard that we can listen about 4x faster than we can speak. Most podcast listeners I know do 1.5x - 2x speed, myself included.
For Youtube (and most others) I usually just paste the URL to `mpv` (using youtube-dl under the hood) to take advantage of it's keyboard shortcuts for easy control over speed and position etc.
I might be playing through a video really fast, but suddenly need to repeat something so hit backspace to drop to normal speed, a press or two of left arrow to jump back (~5 secs each), then tap ] a few times to speed up again. Then if there's an interesting chart or graph shown, just f to toggle full screen, s for screenshot if you like.
Being able to navigate and control linear media with simple keyboard shortcuts feels liberating in a similar way to the first time you grok a powerful edit with just a few keystrokes in Vim or Emacs (except you're just consuming media of course).
Algolia pricing page is intentionally misleading - there is a free "community" tier that has to display "search by algolia", but is otherwise free to use.
I appreciate the effort, but I dislike the interface very much because it is anti-web.
If you're going through the trouble of developing a JavaScript-enabled interface, is it really that hard to work with the History API to provide friendly URLs?
Thanks for raising this. Many links are shareable and history-API friendly – e.g. direct video links, speaker links. (e.g. dev.tube/@eduardsi). Internal site-search is not History API friendly, though.
Any hints which parts of the product need better history support? Submit issue/feature request here:
Search and filtering via tags is very important to be URL friendly, because people like me can then add it as a "search engine" via a keyword in Firefox or Chrome.
It's also the thing that bothers me about Pocket (getpocket.com), the fact that I can't add it as a search provider.
do you really watch these videos? It seems that video is a reallly bad format for such technical information. Much better would be plain text; or, if you want to be fancy, user-editable code snippets.
Some people find it more engaging to learn this way. I recently went through some videos on how OAuth2 works which I found very useful. I would likely find learning how OAuth2 works by reading the documentation extremely dull.
It's cross-discipline dev related. Vimeo support is coming soon. If you have a good game dev YouTube channel to contribute – that would be great! https://github.com/watch-devtube/contrib
Searching for "rust" returns "Google Python Class Day 1 Part 1", "Make CSS Your Secret Super Drawing Tool", "Visualizing a Decision Tree - Machine Learning Recipes #2", etc.
139 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 184 ms ] threadEdit (I may stand corrected) per: 5.E.iii in https://www.youtube.com/t/terms listed in another thread. Disclaimer: IANAL
Edit: It seems to be allowed here. Section 4 E ii, note the double negative in 4 E:
4. General Use of the Service—Permissions and Restrictions
E. Prohibited commercial uses do not include:
* showing YouTube videos through the Embeddable Player on an ad-enabled blog or website, subject to the advertising restrictions set forth above in Section 4.D
https://pasteboard.co/HrwiibV.png
So it looks like depending when you live, it may or may not be against the terms & conditions.
youtube is in decline but it's not happening soon, some videos will disappear from youtube and we still need to save them somehow.
I have no doubt that unless this changes, a new competitor that can get enough network effect can eat youtube's lunch...
https://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/google-vid...
– Ed
Added to the dev plan. Expect to be ready within few weeks!
– @eduardsi
Then I've watched it, and it turned out to be a 90 sec report from one of our public broadcastors about a conference outside my country.
Looking at the channel contribution guidelines[0], this really doesn't belong here.
[0] https://github.com/watch-devtube/contrib#channel-contributio...
(no affiliation other than that I love it)
I don't know of any others, this one's covered my needs pretty well :sweat_smile:
https://awesometalks.party is great if you want talks about web-related topics, but there isn't much else (eg there are no talks on C++ or Java, or modern game development, or big data, etc there..). There's definitely room for another dev talks website that covers more subjects.
Instead, why not scrape all the videos (those with the right licenses of course) and put them on PeerTube? https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube
There are constant discussions in the tech community about how we keep the internet free and usable by all. We (developers) should be leading by example and creating services that don't rely on permission from large corporations to operate. Especially when those services are about distributing knowledge.
Claim 1: Google will shut down video aggregation and hosting sites
Counterclaim 1: But what about x, y and z that exist parallel to Youtube?
Claim 2: Those are allowed to exist by Google.
I dont disagree with your overarching point, it just seem like your arguing it in a flawed manner without any real evidence of your claim occurring or explaining why there are other sites that provide similar functionality without being affected by Google?
>We (developers) should be leading by example and creating services that don't rely on permission from large corporations to operate.
Great so that is what the original poster is doing? And your already claiming that Google is going to shut this down. Seems kinda alarmist.
YouTube specific examples are hard to come by, but here's something related to how they control their API from wikipedia: "YouTube also does not allow videos to run whilst the Android device is sleeping. This can be seen as an annoyance for some users. Particularly if the user is trying to use YouTube as a replacement music player.[13]"
When you look at the reference for that quote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGoVol6ujHk You get "This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated."
Presumably that original use case was outside of their terms, but why? It's not to help users, it's because it infringes on Google Music and their Ad Partners will not be happy if people are listening to ads instead of watching them. If google could get away with monitoring your phone to check you're watching the ads they put up, I'm sure they would because they could charge 3x the price for them.
If we look at other similar companies that have offered APIs for developers to use in the past we actually do find lots of examples of services that already existing being shut down:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter#Developers https://techcrunch.com/2018/04/02/instagram-api-limit/ https://www.cnet.com/news/instagram-dont-use-insta-gram-or-i... https://techcrunch.com/2015/11/17/just-instagram/
So yes, these apps are only allowed to exist while Google allows it, if there's a squeeze at google they will get shut down. There is no reason not to use different tech given the options we have available today if we want to protect content and respect our users.
Most of the videos are uploaded by conferences and they hold the rights.
An example would be: <10 minutes <20 minutes <30 minutes
Youtube does not have this feature rather they only have short (<4 minutes) and long (>20 minutes)
thanks in advance!
Thanks for raising this. Feel free to contribute any missing channel: https://github.com/watch-devtube/contrib
Or just send me the channel links over Twitter (@eduardsi)
A bit annoying that the video automatically pauses when the tab looses focus.
Thanks for raising this! – @eduardsi
This is a brilliant idea, I'm going to file my patent application now.
This is the perfect combination of ebook and video for me, and I didn't know Manning was doing this. Some minor feedback:
- I wish the transcript text size could be increased without affecting the rest of the UI (which seems fine). Maybe it can and I missed it, or I need to be logged in?
- I see “pause on try its” in the page options (it's checked and disabled) but couldn't find any videos that use this. This feature sounds like it would greatly enhance the learning experience and it should be part of all videos. I learn a lot more when actively trying things than when passively watching and reading, and few online courses combine video and text transcripts with hands-on opportunities well.
I just bought Algorithms in Motion on the back of this experience, though, (plus a couple of books I'd been considering) and am looking forward to going through the whole course.
> - I wish the transcript text size could be increased without affecting the rest of the UI (which seems fine). Maybe it can and I missed it, or I need to be logged in?
Totally agreed we need this. I've passed this feedback onto the developers (I'm in editorial here).
> - I see “pause on try its” in the page options (it's checked and disabled) but couldn't find any videos that use this. This feature sounds like it would greatly enhance the learning experience and it should be part of all videos. I learn a lot more when actively trying things than when passively watching and reading, and few online courses combine video and text transcripts with hands-on opportunities well.
Yep, we're still experimenting with this feature. I think you'll see us using it much, much more in future content.
As a customer, I've been seeing the changes they've been doing over the years, and absolutely love the work they've done. At every stage, you can see the attention and care to simple things that make the Manning site a pleasure and the experience better and better. Tell them to keep up the good work.
It's in-house, yes. Interestingly, the original code base was designed to tie book text to audio-book readings, which we use in our liveBook platform. There's various third-party libraries in play for some of it, but other than that we've built it all in-house.
I agree that people can read at 200+ wpm while most people only talk at ~100 wpm. However, some programming presentations are visually intensive with demonstrations of interactive features. That would be videos such as showing how an IDE works (debugging tips and tricks), CSS transforms, GUI workflow (e.g. navigate AWS admin screens to set up security, auto-scaling, etc). For example, I see that the landing page has severgal Google I/O keynotes and those are always heavy with demos.
But yes, for presentations of static text such as explaining the new syntax for C++11, a "talking head" reading the slides may not add much value and just slow you down.
As for transcripts... Since many videos seem to come from YouTube, it may be possible to download the auto-generated captions.[1] (I don't have a YouTube account so I have no idea how well this works.) I noticed one presentation where a speaker was talking about "Qt" framework but the Youtube's speech recognition auto-captioned it as "cute". I don't know if mistranslation is a rare and minor annoyance or if it makes the transcripts unusable.
To downvoters: please let me know what I wrote that didn't add positive contribution to this discussion.
[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=download+youtube+captions&oq...
I wouldn't bother with the automatically generated ones, though. They are not good enough. (Whenever there are real captions, I turn them on to be able to speed up the video beyond the point where I can no longer hear what people say. That's great!)
How can you tell if the captions are real vs auto-generated? Do you mean "real" as in subtitles that are burned into the video source instead of being dynamically overlaid?
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om6HcUUa8DI
Ok, I never noticed that. I just read the captions and assumed obvious misspellings were auto-generated.
For example in this video[1], the caption text is "L1D cache misses" but he's actually saying "L1-dcache misses". (The Linux terminal screen he's showing does display "L1-dcache".) Even though that video is not labeled as "auto-generated", I assumed it was because of the bad caption. Based on your info, I guess CppCon uses humans like Mechanical Turk or other non-domain typists to manually add the captions.
[1] https://youtu.be/2EWejmkKlxs?t=21m16s
In college, I met a deaf guy who always had two women accompany him to lectures; one of them would repeat everything into a mouth-covering microphone to generate an automatic transcription and the other went over it to correct obvious errors. They generated a lot of nonsense, especially when the German professor was using some English loanwords for CS concepts. I was always amazed that the deaf guy still somehow managed to learn something from these garbled transcriptions.
Yes, I get the point that many books have gratuitous screen shots to pad the page count. But that's a separate issue from the idea that some videos don't translate well to transcripts.
>had text descriptions for every element, you just need to read them.
Sure, I understand the value of reading. However, sometimes a presenter showing a live demo will wiggle the mouse cursor around certain options on the screen to emphasize particular things or clarify what may be confusing with a list of check boxes. ("You want to click this; you don't want to click that.") Or maybe demonstrate clicking on a setting and then immediately show the system dashboard statistics changing in realtime as a response. That combination of dynamic "spatial"+"time" to convey technical information is the value of live demos over reading man pages.
The videos are not replacements for concise reference texts but a supplementary teaching tool.
Here's an example of a video demonstrating high interaction with tools that would be very cumbersome to put into text:
https://youtu.be/Wuy_Pm3KaV8?t=20m00s
Lots of of mouse of movement to guide where the eye should look. Lots of scrolling and zooming. Voice annotation that's synchronized with the screen data that's constantly changing. It wouldn't translate well to text. Even if one manually created an accurate text transcript of that talk, all the missing visual cues would inhibit learning how to "drive" the tool like a car. Transcripts are only a reasonable substitute for some types of tech talks.
– Eduards
The mind just beees to get used to the voice and pitch of the speaker
I might be playing through a video really fast, but suddenly need to repeat something so hit backspace to drop to normal speed, a press or two of left arrow to jump back (~5 secs each), then tap ] a few times to speed up again. Then if there's an interesting chart or graph shown, just f to toggle full screen, s for screenshot if you like.
Being able to navigate and control linear media with simple keyboard shortcuts feels liberating in a similar way to the first time you grok a powerful edit with just a few keystrokes in Vim or Emacs (except you're just consuming media of course).
If you're going through the trouble of developing a JavaScript-enabled interface, is it really that hard to work with the History API to provide friendly URLs?
Thanks for raising this. Many links are shareable and history-API friendly – e.g. direct video links, speaker links. (e.g. dev.tube/@eduardsi). Internal site-search is not History API friendly, though.
Any hints which parts of the product need better history support? Submit issue/feature request here:
https://github.com/watch-devtube/web
Thanks!
– Eduards
First of all thanks for your effort.
Search and filtering via tags is very important to be URL friendly, because people like me can then add it as a "search engine" via a keyword in Firefox or Chrome.
It's also the thing that bothers me about Pocket (getpocket.com), the fact that I can't add it as a search provider.
Thanks a lot for your idea. Will implement "hard links" for tags within the next few weeks.
– @eduardsi
It's cross-discipline dev related. Vimeo support is coming soon. If you have a good game dev YouTube channel to contribute – that would be great! https://github.com/watch-devtube/contrib
Thanks for reporting this. Will tune up search results a bit within the next few hours.
– Eduards