Ask HN: Why are status webpages broken?
The first place that I go when there is an outage is the status page of the service. Unfortunately, status pages are outdated and cannot be trusted to represent the status of the service.
Why? Why do companies choose to use Twitter over their own status page or at least not both?
GitHub Status page is 16 days behind https://status.github.com/messages
Slack Status page is saying 100% uptime for the last 30 days while they are having an outage https://status.slack.com/
6 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 23.2 ms ] threadI agree though, in my experience it seems like status pages don't always accurately indicate downtime. Third party status pages might be more reliable.
[0] https://statuspages.me
Your aggregator looks really useful, bookmarking it.
I would suggest having your primary account maintainer and procurement department check the language in your contract. If it does not exist, then have them amend the contract with language that requires the status page to be accurate and that allows you to monitor them from multiple locations. Perhaps consider adding language that allows you to share your monitoring results with them, your internal and external customers.
I am not a lawyer and I do not play one on TV. This is not legal or medical advise. Do not stare at happy fun ball.