12 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 51.7 ms ] thread
Cable had a voice remote that was cool, but I'm a cord cutter, I canceled cable. My phone has voice apps, but I disable them. I dont need to speak to my google/amazon apps.

My Win10 gaming PC has M$ Cortana, but I disabled that. My hdtv is old but I watch most my content on my PC. Seems most new TV's now are voice enabled.

My Car is the only place I use voice, voice dialing.

Wonder how many people really need or want voice-enabled speakers in their homes.

I'm not a huge fan of voice either, but I find this stat fascinating. Why wouldn't Google just put one in every home for free. Who would go Amazon at that point (not to say one is better than the other).
>Who would go Amazon at that point

People who want to buy things other than nexus phones? Google isn't a retailer of anything except their own hardware as far as I know. Is something very different in the USA on this front?

I should have clarified better - who would go to Amazon for their voice products, e.g., Alexa
For that I have no idea. I don't understand why anyone would have voice products in their house. If google gave me a free home mini I would drop it in the bin without a second thought.
Yes! Let's put microphones in every single household in the US. That way, then it just becomes sooooo easy to pass a law for the company (in this case Google), to collaborate via a National Security Letter to make any feed available.

I can imagine the NSA and FBI salivating over the mere idea of this.

We're already carrying microphones around in our pockets. Do the speaker microphones really make the situation worse? When it is almost guaranteed that there is already multiple microphones present.
I would say they do. For instance, if I got a Google Home it would be the only non-Apple device with a microphone in my apartment, making gov access significantly easier.
Do you really think isolating yourself to the Apple ecosystem makes you more secure? If so: how do you qualify that?
Selling hardware below manufacturing cost in order to undercut competition. Isn't that called "dumping"? Wouldn't that be an anti-trust issue?