Annoyingly, the caption of the second photo seems to imply that the man is still considered a danger today. Although the article makes no mention as to why.
This story highlights a key problem with science reporting.
How many people are going to read this story correcting the original story? A small fraction.
Every time there's some sensational discovery it's all over the media, but whenever there's a retraction or the study fails to be replicated (another huge problem in modern science), the retraction never gets media attention.
14 comments
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 42.6 ms ] threadCooling Off Hotseattle: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,31486,0...
Mr. Famous Comes Home: https://www.forbes.com/asap/1997/1201/144.html
How many people are going to read this story correcting the original story? A small fraction.
Every time there's some sensational discovery it's all over the media, but whenever there's a retraction or the study fails to be replicated (another huge problem in modern science), the retraction never gets media attention.
It's pop science at its worst.
This is exactly what I'd expect to find when searching a skeleton half-buried under a rock in an Elder Scrolls game.