Maybe I don't get it, but this seems like a truly horrible name. I didn't have an idea of what the site was for from the name and even reading Joel's post left it a little vague. Once I was there, I got a feel for what was going on, but I still don't think I will remember the place.
For a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?
webapps.stackexchange.com seems like it would be a better name to me. Not so sure why they'd want to not continue to use subdomains of stackexchange.com.
All the politicians in office right now were the highest voted, but that doesn't mean they are good. I didn't click on on the referenced link as I don't even want to know what was second worse.
13 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 41.5 ms ] threadFor a site aimed at users, why use a name referring to webapp distribution?
The look and feel of this site is almost too sleek and clean (I say this as a designer)
I like it and all, but it also feels a little hmm soulless?
Looks like a Windows 95 application.