1 comment

[ 6.7 ms ] story [ 14.7 ms ] thread
Complaining about performance reviews seems similar to complaining about the tech interview process: there's general consensus it's bad and has many shortcomings, yet companies keep doing it and few feasible alternatives are put on the table.

Also, I don't see much of a difference between "classic" performance reviews and the "360-degree reviews" that the article mentions, other than the latter having better branding.