Facebook sees mixed Q2 earnings with slowest-ever growth, stock tanks (techcrunch.com) 6 points by nostromo 7y ago ↗ HN
[–] nabla9 7y ago ↗ > Facebook still managed to boost its average revenue per user in all markets, growing from $23.59 to $25.91 in the US & CanadaIs that revenue per quarter or per year? [–] martinald 7y ago ↗ Per year iirc [–] nabla9 7y ago ↗ Thanks.If FB would offer option to subscribe for $2.2 per month with no ads and strong privacy, they would not lose anything. [–] corgiorgy 7y ago ↗ Not true. Users who are willing to shell out for premium service are a much more lucrative advertising audience. [–] martinald 7y ago ↗ Apparently I'm wrong, it is per quarter. Which is pretty crazy.
[–] martinald 7y ago ↗ Per year iirc [–] nabla9 7y ago ↗ Thanks.If FB would offer option to subscribe for $2.2 per month with no ads and strong privacy, they would not lose anything. [–] corgiorgy 7y ago ↗ Not true. Users who are willing to shell out for premium service are a much more lucrative advertising audience. [–] martinald 7y ago ↗ Apparently I'm wrong, it is per quarter. Which is pretty crazy.
[–] nabla9 7y ago ↗ Thanks.If FB would offer option to subscribe for $2.2 per month with no ads and strong privacy, they would not lose anything. [–] corgiorgy 7y ago ↗ Not true. Users who are willing to shell out for premium service are a much more lucrative advertising audience. [–] martinald 7y ago ↗ Apparently I'm wrong, it is per quarter. Which is pretty crazy.
[–] corgiorgy 7y ago ↗ Not true. Users who are willing to shell out for premium service are a much more lucrative advertising audience.
5 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 26.7 ms ] threadIs that revenue per quarter or per year?
If FB would offer option to subscribe for $2.2 per month with no ads and strong privacy, they would not lose anything.