HN Explorer

18 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 47.4 ms ] thread
[dead] sungju1203
although nobody gives a shit about these tech anymore, there needs to be some comment at least. :P
mbrameld
You have to exist in a pretty small, uninformed bubble to believe that.
dang
Please don't do this here.
nickserv
Does this run on Linux now? Honest question.

I remember some years back toying around with C# on Linux using Mono. The language is nice, but the .net stuff quickly became limiting.

scoj
Yes, it has for quite a while now. To be clear, .NET Core is cross-platform. .NET Framework (old/existing) is still Windows-only. You can target both by targeting .NET Standard. Still confusing, I know :(
jonoc
Yes this runs of linux and macos now. dotnetcore is multiplatform. It doesn't use Mono.
geezerjay
> Yes this runs of linux and macos now.

That's technically true, but unlike any framework that actually runs on linux asp.net stuff can only run on microsoft's kestrel webserver, which requires being behind a reverse proxy.

sebazzz
There is no reason it cannot run as an apache fastcgi module. They are currently working on getting it to run in the W3WP working process on IIS/Windows.
openbasic
Is it just me that thinks this is absurdly verbose? Imagine adding a new field on this. Or having, like any other CRUD app, 25 other entities. What a nightmare.
bradenb
Verbose compared to what? It doesn't seem overly verbose to me. This isn't some Hello World example, this provides a fully featured real-world example (minus all the Okta fluff).
dragonwriter
> Verbose compared to what?

Well, on the back end, lots of things, for example, postgrest.

openbasic
postgrest is perfect for control panels. I wonder if there's anything faster.
openbasic
Rails. Laravel. Express.js. Whatever. If you use that many DTOs for a real-world CRUD, you are killing your company.
hadrien01
This reads as an ad for Okta, and is posted by an Okta employee.
[deleted]
(comment deleted)