Needless to say, the government has committed to it's role:
1) the expert won't be named, "to protect his children", I kid you not, that's the reason stated
2) he evaluated all reports that decided if children would be "placed" (kidnapped by the authorities, and placed). None of these reports are being called into question.
3) "there is no sign that the Norwegian authorities are planning any general review of cases the convicted expert was involved in – or that they believe his disgrace has any wider implications for the system."
4) "the Board of Health Supervision, the body which has now withdrawn his licence, said it was not planning to investigate his professional practice. It says there is no information that the convicted expert had committed any crimes in his work, or any medical malpractice."
5) "One journalist has calculated, however, that children with a foreign mother are four times more likely than other children in Norway to be forcibly taken from their families." ... the head of the Child expert commission explains: Katrin Koch says: “Maybe the level for ‘good enough’ in Norway is different from other countries.”
6) Needless to say, for the person caught abusing child porn for 20 years ... "She and other parents who’ve lost children are also surprised by a family court decision that the disgraced expert can keep custody of his own young children."
because ...
"there is no evidence to suggest that people who download child pornography are more likely than anyone else to commit other offences against children."
(but apparently a neighbor reporting you "smacked" your children ONCE is enough to take away an immigrants' children)
7) let's not even mention the question for redress for anyone harmed by this person ...
They're not even allowed to know his name !
Could it be worse ? Yes :
56 year-old Jo Erik Brøyn ...
His "2 children" ... are ... 2 "placed" children, kidnapped by the Norwegian authorities from their legitimate/natural parents.
1 comment
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 15.1 ms ] thread1) the expert won't be named, "to protect his children", I kid you not, that's the reason stated
2) he evaluated all reports that decided if children would be "placed" (kidnapped by the authorities, and placed). None of these reports are being called into question.
3) "there is no sign that the Norwegian authorities are planning any general review of cases the convicted expert was involved in – or that they believe his disgrace has any wider implications for the system."
4) "the Board of Health Supervision, the body which has now withdrawn his licence, said it was not planning to investigate his professional practice. It says there is no information that the convicted expert had committed any crimes in his work, or any medical malpractice."
5) "One journalist has calculated, however, that children with a foreign mother are four times more likely than other children in Norway to be forcibly taken from their families." ... the head of the Child expert commission explains: Katrin Koch says: “Maybe the level for ‘good enough’ in Norway is different from other countries.”
6) Needless to say, for the person caught abusing child porn for 20 years ... "She and other parents who’ve lost children are also surprised by a family court decision that the disgraced expert can keep custody of his own young children."
because ...
"there is no evidence to suggest that people who download child pornography are more likely than anyone else to commit other offences against children."
(but apparently a neighbor reporting you "smacked" your children ONCE is enough to take away an immigrants' children)
7) let's not even mention the question for redress for anyone harmed by this person ...
They're not even allowed to know his name !
Could it be worse ? Yes :
56 year-old Jo Erik Brøyn ...
His "2 children" ... are ... 2 "placed" children, kidnapped by the Norwegian authorities from their legitimate/natural parents.