Ask HN: Which parts of everyday life are more complex than people expect?
Afterwards, I realized that in IT, we touch on a lot of aspects of real life that a layman thinks of as boring or trivial, but which turn out to be surprisingly complex when you look at them in detail. Since my time on radio was quite fun, I'm thinking about maybe making a small podcast series on these surprising complexities.
Now, of course the first step is to actually come up with a list of such things. That's my question for you: Do you know some aspect of everyday life that is much more complex than what laypeople usually appreciate?
I'll start with the first one that came to my mind: time zones. Did you know there are actually two time zones in Germany? The first one covers nearly all of Germany, the second one is for one tiny village of 1,300 people that is one very special snowflake in a lot of ways [2].
[1] Recording is here, but it's German: https://c3d2.de/news/pentaradio24-20180724.html
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%BCsingen_am_Hochrhein
22 comments
[ 712 ms ] story [ 203 ms ] threadLikewise mains AC power frequency policing. It has quite interesting set points and limits.
Some examples:
1) Banks in the US put the burden of ID theft on the consumer. This is hilarious, because it is the bank who has been robbed, not me. Additionally, why does my bank mail my personal info to my former addresses for a few months? I always ask for web statements only.
2) Why does a passport cost nearly $100?
3) Why can't visas and borders be paperless and less restrictive?
4) Why can't month-to-month leases be easier to find?
Anyway, losing weight used to be summarized as "calories in, calories out." But through physical, laymen-led experimentation posted on youtube, we as a society have learned that hormones and electrolytes have a very heavy influence on how calories are absorbed and how water is retained.
Airbnb can be of dodgy quality sometimes, but it has filled most of the demand as you say. There are lots of property taxes and squatter-friendly laws in my area, so I guess thats why landlords feel the need to have very restrictive terms :/
Traffic flow policing is like live operations research: tweak one bit, the others Go bananas. The tail back delay usually outlives the actual blockage by hours.
Supply chain logistics in goods and services. How does a small tire shop in the city get stock to fix that one off car walk in? Milk supply..
Oh dairy: making ghee? In a factory? You have like a 4C temperature window. Colder, try pipe cleaners on twenty tonnes of rancid butter. Hotter? It burns black..
Concrete pouring depends on slump tests done onsite. Watch what they're doing with that two part mould and simultaneously pouring the entire load into a pumper. Now think about it going wrong. Or the concrete delivery itself, that's a nightmare.
You get two signups on a website. One is for me@example.com and the other is for Me@example.com. Is this one person or two separate people? And how do you store them in a database?
Some email systems will treat me and Me as two separate users, so if you change the case there is a chance the wrong person will get the email. So, the advice is that you should never change the case. But if you don't change the case should you treat them as separate users?
What you need to consider at sign ups are more than just an email to distinguish.
Ex. if name, address and phone are the same, but the emails are different, chances are you have the same person and thus you can assume it is the same person.
I wanted to make myself a simple cappuccino at home. I now have several pieces of prosumer gear, gadgets, fancy beans, and spend my free time reading up on things like coffee grind distribution methods, hacking my machine to add a PID, and other such ephemera. On the plus side, I'm saving several hundred dollars a year on my coffee habit despite all the toys, so there's that.
As for coffee, even the foam on top of an espresso is complex.
You might enjoy this paper if you haven't already read it: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140933/
And agreed on the consistency part. For espresso, once you figure out what you like, you begin the endless quest to make it that way consistently.
https://www.gimletmedia.com/surprisingly-awesome
You should be able to find audience reaction to the podcast and it's cancellation if you dig around a bit on reddit. Learn from their work and make yours better.
Also, 99% Invisible would be another podcast to research to ensure you are barking up a different tree
https://99percentinvisible.org/
https://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article%20folder/Breathing.htm...
Regarding the question in the title specifically, everything at all times is complex. Now, if we choose to see it that way, that's another question. Ex. A car gets us from point A to point B, and so we see it as such (ie, what it does for us, not what it is). But when that car breaks down, its intricate and endless complexity is revealed to us. All of a sudden, we get a glimpse of what it is and not what it does for us. Which is to say, we look at everyday life at the lowest resolution possible, in order to get on with our day. It has to be high enough resolution to hold some value and meaning, but not so high that it adds unneeded complexity to our life.