I'm a huge fan of corvids, but evidence that the crowbox works is dubious [1].
Incidentally if you enjoy reading about crows take a look at the author's other posts on that blog. She's a scientist who writes about them (and her work) very frequently.
In theory it works, I've seen it work. But in practice I'm afraid a theme park will be so full of edible trash that the crows might question the reasoning behind picking non-edible trash up to get a reward.
Give the Brawndo, it's what plants crave. Seriously give them what they like to eat. Make it addictive like we do for fast food. Not only will you have birds that do your bidding, but they'll be nice and fat so you can catch 'em if you need to later.
I'm continually fascinated by how corvids seem to show this level of intelligence without any of the brain structures that we usually associate with it. Can someone point me to a source that explains this?
I have magpies outside my window and they are very intelligent and nice creatures. They sit in trees two together, close to each other, enjoying each other's company. I've seen them group together in bigger numbers to fend off cats and I've seen them tease cats in situations where they know the cat can't reach them.
They are known to recognize faces of people and have stunning memory, remembering hundreds of places where they stash their food reserves etc. I think they are awesome.
I'm not gone on them, they persecute the local song bird population, we have a plague of them and the even more unwelcome grey crow.
The magpie's call is either a horrible squeal or an equally unpleasant chchchchchch sound
Not specifically a text about corvids, but there are stories and studies about corvids discussed in this book I really enjoyed reading: Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are?
FWIW, I recently read the observation that intelligence seems to be correlated with brain volume relative to body volume, rather than absolute brain volume. Who knows why- but think about the animals we know to be smart. Elephants, whales but not fish, corvids but not warblers, humans, great apes but not monkeys, ...
> brain structures that we usually associate with it
That's just human (or, more generally, mammalian) exceptionalism/bias.
As a sibling comment helpfully linked, there's now research showing that avian brains create/house intelligence in different parts, with different structures.
Machine learning to the rescue. Actually do a image analysis on each piece of rubbish deposited. You can use machine learning to induce learning in crows. Just imagine this sort of thing being in every park, it could significantly cut down on litter. Who knows maybe we can get birds to weed our yards for us using these sorts of methods.
There's a similar story about dolphins who were trained to pick up any litter in their pool and give it to their trainer in return for fish. The dolphins began to hide the trash and tear off pieces so that they could get multiple fish.
Also shows the dangers of optimizing for metrics without thinking really hard about what kind of metric your optimizing for and what kind of side-effects it can have.
How about just teach people to throw away their own trash? It's amazing they taught the crows but my guess is it will end up with the unintended consequence of encouraging people to just dump their trash whereever even more since "it's the crows' job to clean up"
As awful as this sounds, I think it might be easier to train crows to pick up people's trash than to train people how to throw away their trash. People are apparently not as easily teachable as literal birdbrains.
More like teaching all the people to deal with their trash with perfect reliability is harder than teaching literal bird brains to pick up the trash that the humans haven't dealt with. If only half the crows get it, that's probably enough. Only half of the humans would be a catastrophe!
Using people to pick up trash and throw them properly is the solution that has been used for centuries. Crows are paid peanuts (literally) for bringing back trash. They are employees.
And I am sure that if you were to offer people a dollar as a reward each time they bring back a trash to a trashcan, the parks would be clean.
In Berlin glass bottles are reused and there is a reward for bringing them back to specific bins. I have seen homeless people looking for trash and filling carts of these.
That happens in San Francisco, too. You'll on occasion even see someone on the local public transit with a big trash bag full of bottles. I guess they're on their way to a redemption center for the deposit.
That reward as you call it, has created a 2nd level economy in Germany.
It is not only homeless, people with very low pensions or not able to get a proper full time job also hunt for them, everywhere.
On the streets, trains, subway, beach, lakes, you name it.
To the point that many people don't throw away bottles anymore, leaving them grouped outside the trash cans, as means to help those people pick them without messing with trash.
There are even trash cans in the Rhein region that have bottle holders around them.
So yeah it helps keep the street clean from bottles, but fighting the causes of this 2nd level economy would probably be a better idea.
Our public waste bins are designed like this in Vancouver. People put bottles/cans with deposits in a circular metal holder below the rim of the trash bin so that the homeless can pick them up easily. There are a LOT of homeless here. I moved back to Canada from Central America and my first impression of being back in the developed world is my god look at all the homelessness.
A lot of the litter I see is thrown from cars. I can't imagine the people who throw cigarette butts and trash out of their car windows driving around to find a bin for a nugget.
I think the people that throw trash from cars are EXACTLY the kind of people that would hunt down a nugget bin, but then get really pissy and entitled when it out of dipping sauce.
Maybe we can also teach crows to harass the homeless so we can finally get something comfortable to sit on instead of those awful chairs that are meant to be impossible to sleep on?
The park is usually pretty clean, not that many people litter anyway so as suspect it's more for the novelty and as a fun project for the falconry staff than to save on cleaning.
>He has teamed with a French developer to build two “Tsargrad” theme parks in Crimea that will present a family-friendly recounting of Russian history. He’s also developing Tsargrad TV, a cable network—for now it’s just a YouTube channel—that will provide a conservative Orthodox perspective on the news. “We want to build up [a network based on] Orthodox principles the way Fox News was built,” he says. “We want to show the news in the way that Orthodox people, who are 70 to 80 percent of the population, see it.” (Jack Hanick, a former Fox News employee, will be a producer for the network.) I ask if Russia’s existing TV networks aren’t conservative enough. “Aren’t Orthodox enough,” he counters.
>But his goals go beyond making Russia a more religious society. A self-described monarchist, he favors a full return of the Russian Empire, including the restoration of the czar. “Monarchies have been alive in history for thousands of years,” he says. “Republics, just for several centuries, yet we assume that monarchies belong to the past and republics to the future.” He points out that seven of the 10 wealthiest countries in the world are monarchies.
Je viens de lire la partie de l’article cité et ça a surtout l’air d’être une controverse lancée par des universitaires de gauche qui voient du politique partout et qui ne supportent pas qu’on puisse proposer une vision différente de la leur. En outre, il ne faut pas oublier que c’est assez courant en France que quand quelque chose a du succès, il faut le critiquer...
Je me rappelle y avoir été quand j’étais gosse, et les spectacles étaient fantastiques. Et en tant qu’enfant ce qui intéresse ce sont les épées et les combats, pas un hypothétique sous-texte cryto-contre-révolutionnaire. Les adultes eux peuvent (et devraient) se renseigner eux même sur la période, l’histoire de France et même du monde, qui est d’ailleurs traitée de façon de plus en plus partiale à l’école (de la république).
I dont know but it's good for the other hn users : you shouldn't waste your time reading about french politics on hn. The park owner is notorious (far) right figure in french which derails every discussion about it.
>Je me rappelle y avoir été quand j’étais gosse, et les spectacles étaient fantastiques.
Justement, c'est incontestable, et ça mérite d'être étudié. Le spectacle peut être utile aux visiteurs ("c'est bien, c'est fantastique") autant qu'aux organisateurs (lis l'article de Slate et ce qu'attendent les financeurs de tels projets).
>Et en tant qu’enfant ce qui intéresse (...)
Mettez-vous du côté des organisateurs (qui sont adultes, eux): penses-tu qu'ils ignorent l'effet que produit un spectacle pour faire passer une certaine vision de l'histoire?
>controverse lancée par des universitaires de gauche qui voient du politique partout et qui ne supportent pas qu’on puisse proposer une vision différente de la leur.
Pas besoin de lancer une controverse. Je ne suis ni universitaire ni de gauche et pourtant j'ai été sidéré par les spectacles qui se veulent fantastique, que les gens prennent comme tels mais dont bien peu de gens peuvent critiquer (au sens positif du terme). J'ai assez étudié l'histoire de France, le marketing et ce genre de show pour penser qu'il est utile de se pencher sur les motivations affichées par les organisateurs et leurs soutiens financiers. J'aime le sectacle et sait très bien apprécier le jeu et le fantastique, ça ne m'empêche pas de penser que Disney et Disneyland cherchent à valoriser le contenu qu'ils produisent et distribuent (e.g rachat de Starwars), au delà de l'entertainment. Je pense qu'il serait bon aussi de fouiller un peu les projets de ceux qui portent le Puy du Fou: pas de besoin de lancer une controverse pour se demander pourquoi une partie des revenus de la Cinéscénie est reversée à des asso anti-IVG.
Jeanne d'arc is a myth in French history. Just like the other shows about King Arthur's and Les trois Mousquetaires.
The park is more about culture and folklore than royalist propaganda.
Many of the shows glorify Christianism (like the Viking show where the Viking convert to Christianism at the end when they see a Saint rising from a river) or the Roman era arena show where the good guys are Christians persecuted in the arena, shouting to the Romans that their gods are fake (and winning at the end).
Other shows glorify the Vendee region (where the park is), and present King loyalists who fought against the Revolution as heroes (Charette).
Still, the park is beautiful and the shows are very good. I went with my kids and they enjoyed the sword fights and stunts, and didn't understand anything of their bullshit.
I read somewhere about training crows to pickup cigarette butts in exchange food. I’ve always wondered if it would be possible to train a crow to pick up loose coins for food. I imagine the actual machine would be fairly easy to build but the most difficult part would be keeping the coin pathway free of non-coins as the crows are likely to pick up bottle caps, key rings and other junk. The other problem would be dealing with your neighbours as there would always be crows hanging around.
Side note: All the crows in Vancouver roost on a single street. Every day around sundown there are 10s of thousands of crows flying east and creating a chaotic scene at times. I’ve seen hundreds of crows ripping up a lawn looking for worms once and it felt like a scene from a movie. Here is a video of all the crows causing ruckus: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_QuEjaG4Ghs
Also we have one crow here in Vancouver who was raised by a human so he is essentially part of the population. He takes the sktrain, walks into McDonald’s and even stole a knife from a crime scene once. It’s an absolute hoot. He even has his own Instagram page: https://instagram.com/canuckthecrow
The coin thing could possibly make for a modest business model. But crows are SMART and you might want to consider the incentives you'd be creating by rewarding them for finding money... :)
Crow attacks generally only happen for a few weeks every spring as the young has left the nest and is still too young to fly. It's a known issue here and not really anything to worry about.
> I read somewhere about training crows to pickup cigarette butts in exchange food. I’ve always wondered if it would be possible to train a crow to pick up loose coins for food.
Probably not. It probably seems like I'm shilling this researcher's blog in this thread at this point but this commentary [1] gives a short explanation of why.
One of my hobbies is actually bird watching, particularly with crows. I love the animals, they're very fascinating creatures. I've had the opportunity to interact with many of them because I set out peanuts for them near my neighborhood. They've very gradually become acclimated to this routine, and they reliably arrive to pick up food if I make a particular noise and they're in the area.
But I'm very skeptical that I could "train" them to start exchanging items for food. In captivity a crow's intelligence can be especially fostered and trained because there's no other source of food to distract it. If you want it to proceed through a puzzle [2] to get food it has to do so. But wild crows are very, very cautious and (like most animals) very economically rational in their feeding habits. To date none of the wild crows who give people items have been trained to do so, it's been a happy accident (it's never happened to me, unfortunately). If you start imposing an exchange system on the food dispensary, you might find that the crows simply go elsewhere for easier meals.
_____________
1. I read somewhere about training crows to pickup cigarette butts in exchange food. I’ve always wondered if it would be possible to train a crow to pick up loose coins for food.
Clearly an economically rational animal can still be influenced to a certain behavior, if you make the reward attractive enough.
It's not like crows are not willing to work for food. They have been documented breaking open stubborn mollusks by repeatedly flying them high above a road and dropping them until they crack, or throwing them under oncoming traffic to be smashed open.
Yeah that's true, and I've seen a number of corvid species (including crows) taking my peanuts and dropping them a few stories. They also like to soak almonds in water to soften them for chewing.
The thing is that there are ample other food sources so whatever you provide needs to be truly exceptional insofar as rewards go. And the crows might not know it's a great reward until they solve the puzzle to get it.
I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm just pessimistic.
> But I'm very skeptical that I could "train" them to start exchanging items for food. In captivity a crow's intelligence can be especially fostered and trained because there's no other source of food to distract it.
What seems not to have been mentioned so far is the difference between the economic rationality of an individual versus what happens when there's a large population of those individuals.
AFAICT, the goal of these projects isn't to train individuals but to train the population, in aggregate, perform the task.
Same thing here way over on the other coast in the Maritimes. The crows by the hundreds head home in the early evening, it's quite a sight. There is a local play/artsy thing about it too people dress up like crows. http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/news/local/crows-run-riot-throu...
I think it's what the above poster was specifically asking. Is this safe for the crows? It's a cute circus trick, but has anyone checked that it's actually safe for them?
There is a nice ted talk (from 2008, 10min) about crow intelligence and teaching crows how to pick up trash. It has stuck with me ever since I first saw it, highly recommended.
You should read this short commentary [1] from a corvid researcher. There will probably be replication issues with trying to get wild crows to pick up food using his crowbox idea.
Thanks! That is disheartening, however the spirit of the talk is still inspiring and this HN post reinforces the idea.
The motivational part is after all a bit orthogonal to the intelligence claim. So the answer to the question "could we teach crows to do this?" might instead be "absolutely, however wild crows choose not to participate". Which is quite different depending on which viewpoint you have.
The other anecdotes from that talk are still valid and equally fascinating.
Can't recommend that talk any more though, at least not without preceding it with the information you linked...
If "litter collecting crows" produces an amusing mental image, just imagine my momentary initial misreading of that healine with "intelligent cows" and somehow it seems to fit the "theme park" idiom far more appropriately.
93 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 150 ms ] threadInterested to see how this will work, for how long, and whether it's just PR.
Incidentally if you enjoy reading about crows take a look at the author's other posts on that blog. She's a scientist who writes about them (and her work) very frequently.
__________
1. https://corvidresearch.blog/2015/03/12/a-scientists-thoughts...
Not too scientific I’m afraid but maybe useful.
They are known to recognize faces of people and have stunning memory, remembering hundreds of places where they stash their food reserves etc. I think they are awesome.
Güntürkün: Cognition without cortex. https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S136...
Press release: http://news.rub.de/english/press-releases/2016-03-03-complex...
His talks are pretty good, there may be higher quality recordings than this one though: https://youtu.be/nHTTVFDjQ1Q
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30231743-are-we-smart-en...
That's just human (or, more generally, mammalian) exceptionalism/bias.
As a sibling comment helpfully linked, there's now research showing that avian brains create/house intelligence in different parts, with different structures.
And I am sure that if you were to offer people a dollar as a reward each time they bring back a trash to a trashcan, the parks would be clean.
In Berlin glass bottles are reused and there is a reward for bringing them back to specific bins. I have seen homeless people looking for trash and filling carts of these.
It is not only homeless, people with very low pensions or not able to get a proper full time job also hunt for them, everywhere.
On the streets, trains, subway, beach, lakes, you name it.
To the point that many people don't throw away bottles anymore, leaving them grouped outside the trash cans, as means to help those people pick them without messing with trash.
There are even trash cans in the Rhein region that have bottle holders around them.
So yeah it helps keep the street clean from bottles, but fighting the causes of this 2nd level economy would probably be a better idea.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=trash+in+Indian+cities
They already have many birds, and a falconry show so they certainly have the skills to train birds to do what they want.
https://www.puydufou.com/en/lallee-des-volieres
The park is usually pretty clean, not that many people litter anyway so as suspect it's more for the novelty and as a fun project for the falconry staff than to save on cleaning.
The owners of the park are also working with ultraorthodox oligarch Konstantin Malofeev to create similar parks in Russia and Crimea (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstantin_Malofeev).
>He has teamed with a French developer to build two “Tsargrad” theme parks in Crimea that will present a family-friendly recounting of Russian history. He’s also developing Tsargrad TV, a cable network—for now it’s just a YouTube channel—that will provide a conservative Orthodox perspective on the news. “We want to build up [a network based on] Orthodox principles the way Fox News was built,” he says. “We want to show the news in the way that Orthodox people, who are 70 to 80 percent of the population, see it.” (Jack Hanick, a former Fox News employee, will be a producer for the network.) I ask if Russia’s existing TV networks aren’t conservative enough. “Aren’t Orthodox enough,” he counters.
>But his goals go beyond making Russia a more religious society. A self-described monarchist, he favors a full return of the Russian Empire, including the restoration of the czar. “Monarchies have been alive in history for thousands of years,” he says. “Republics, just for several centuries, yet we assume that monarchies belong to the past and republics to the future.” He points out that seven of the 10 wealthiest countries in the world are monarchies.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2...
Puy du Fou is using some of its revenues to finance religious/royalist French organizations and discreetly supports anti-abortion campaigns (https://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2015/07/08/2140471-puy-fou-...).
Je me rappelle y avoir été quand j’étais gosse, et les spectacles étaient fantastiques. Et en tant qu’enfant ce qui intéresse ce sont les épées et les combats, pas un hypothétique sous-texte cryto-contre-révolutionnaire. Les adultes eux peuvent (et devraient) se renseigner eux même sur la période, l’histoire de France et même du monde, qui est d’ailleurs traitée de façon de plus en plus partiale à l’école (de la république).
Justement, c'est incontestable, et ça mérite d'être étudié. Le spectacle peut être utile aux visiteurs ("c'est bien, c'est fantastique") autant qu'aux organisateurs (lis l'article de Slate et ce qu'attendent les financeurs de tels projets).
>Et en tant qu’enfant ce qui intéresse (...)
Mettez-vous du côté des organisateurs (qui sont adultes, eux): penses-tu qu'ils ignorent l'effet que produit un spectacle pour faire passer une certaine vision de l'histoire?
>controverse lancée par des universitaires de gauche qui voient du politique partout et qui ne supportent pas qu’on puisse proposer une vision différente de la leur.
Pas besoin de lancer une controverse. Je ne suis ni universitaire ni de gauche et pourtant j'ai été sidéré par les spectacles qui se veulent fantastique, que les gens prennent comme tels mais dont bien peu de gens peuvent critiquer (au sens positif du terme). J'ai assez étudié l'histoire de France, le marketing et ce genre de show pour penser qu'il est utile de se pencher sur les motivations affichées par les organisateurs et leurs soutiens financiers. J'aime le sectacle et sait très bien apprécier le jeu et le fantastique, ça ne m'empêche pas de penser que Disney et Disneyland cherchent à valoriser le contenu qu'ils produisent et distribuent (e.g rachat de Starwars), au delà de l'entertainment. Je pense qu'il serait bon aussi de fouiller un peu les projets de ceux qui portent le Puy du Fou: pas de besoin de lancer une controverse pour se demander pourquoi une partie des revenus de la Cinéscénie est reversée à des asso anti-IVG.
Avez-vous lu l'article de Slate et ses sources?
Many of the shows glorify Christianism (like the Viking show where the Viking convert to Christianism at the end when they see a Saint rising from a river) or the Roman era arena show where the good guys are Christians persecuted in the arena, shouting to the Romans that their gods are fake (and winning at the end).
Other shows glorify the Vendee region (where the park is), and present King loyalists who fought against the Revolution as heroes (Charette).
Still, the park is beautiful and the shows are very good. I went with my kids and they enjoyed the sword fights and stunts, and didn't understand anything of their bullshit.
Side note: All the crows in Vancouver roost on a single street. Every day around sundown there are 10s of thousands of crows flying east and creating a chaotic scene at times. I’ve seen hundreds of crows ripping up a lawn looking for worms once and it felt like a scene from a movie. Here is a video of all the crows causing ruckus: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_QuEjaG4Ghs
Also we have one crow here in Vancouver who was raised by a human so he is essentially part of the population. He takes the sktrain, walks into McDonald’s and even stole a knife from a crime scene once. It’s an absolute hoot. He even has his own Instagram page: https://instagram.com/canuckthecrow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flU0rDDGtHU
So... Can't this plan backfire too?
Probably not. It probably seems like I'm shilling this researcher's blog in this thread at this point but this commentary [1] gives a short explanation of why.
One of my hobbies is actually bird watching, particularly with crows. I love the animals, they're very fascinating creatures. I've had the opportunity to interact with many of them because I set out peanuts for them near my neighborhood. They've very gradually become acclimated to this routine, and they reliably arrive to pick up food if I make a particular noise and they're in the area.
But I'm very skeptical that I could "train" them to start exchanging items for food. In captivity a crow's intelligence can be especially fostered and trained because there's no other source of food to distract it. If you want it to proceed through a puzzle [2] to get food it has to do so. But wild crows are very, very cautious and (like most animals) very economically rational in their feeding habits. To date none of the wild crows who give people items have been trained to do so, it's been a happy accident (it's never happened to me, unfortunately). If you start imposing an exchange system on the food dispensary, you might find that the crows simply go elsewhere for easier meals.
_____________
1. I read somewhere about training crows to pickup cigarette butts in exchange food. I’ve always wondered if it would be possible to train a crow to pick up loose coins for food.
2. https://youtu.be/ZerUbHmuY04
It's not like crows are not willing to work for food. They have been documented breaking open stubborn mollusks by repeatedly flying them high above a road and dropping them until they crack, or throwing them under oncoming traffic to be smashed open.
The thing is that there are ample other food sources so whatever you provide needs to be truly exceptional insofar as rewards go. And the crows might not know it's a great reward until they solve the puzzle to get it.
I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm just pessimistic.
Surely that would depend on the exchange rate?
What seems not to have been mentioned so far is the difference between the economic rationality of an individual versus what happens when there's a large population of those individuals.
AFAICT, the goal of these projects isn't to train individuals but to train the population, in aggregate, perform the task.
Yep, this guy did it and it is quite fascinating; TED talk: https://www.ted.com/talks/joshua_klein_on_the_intelligence_o... Website: http://www.josh.is/crow-machine/
And also, this dutch startup is aiming at training crows to pick up cigarettes: https://www.crowdedcities.com/
I guess eating them isn't going to be good, but is picking them up and depositing them going to be poisonous to the crow?
https://www.ted.com/talks/joshua_klein_on_the_intelligence_o...
____________
1. https://corvidresearch.blog/2015/03/12/a-scientists-thoughts...
The motivational part is after all a bit orthogonal to the intelligence claim. So the answer to the question "could we teach crows to do this?" might instead be "absolutely, however wild crows choose not to participate". Which is quite different depending on which viewpoint you have.
The other anecdotes from that talk are still valid and equally fascinating.
Can't recommend that talk any more though, at least not without preceding it with the information you linked...