Launch HN: Fintual Inc. (YC S18) – Automated Wealth Manager for Latin America
After many conversations with my current business partner Omar, who had been 8 years working for the largest wealth manager in LATAM, I was shocked to understand how Latin American people, including people around me, were unfairly paying enormous amounts of money to banks who offered very expensive and many times overly complex investment solutions to retail / uninformed long term investors. After investigating how Betterment, Wealthfront and passive investment strategies in general had been changing the landscape for Americans, we were motivated to do whatever it took to solve this problem in LATAM starting from our own country Chile which, despite being a tiny country, has more than 60 billion dollars allocated in Mutual Funds by itself.
We started by building a responsive website using AngularJS and Ruby on Rails as quickly as we could to get user feedback soon, we mostly copied the onboarding process directly from Betterment. At the beginning we thought automating every step of the investment process was the most important challenge, but now, after some experience and several conversations with YC partners, we have come to realize the real problem to solve is none other than distribution: how to reach millions of users in an economically viable way. Banks already have the clients, while we have to explain and convince people there’s a better way. At first we tried to find an incumbent to work with us, but after a year trying we decided to get our own license (the equivalent to a FINRA Series 6 license) which took a large part of the seed round and 8 months of work, but finally got it. We’ve been growing at a healthy 10% week over week since March now thanks mainly to word of mouth, but we know we need to have a better handle on this growth for the future.
I’m very excited to be at this point, I have been reading HN for 10 years now and I only dreamed about making a YC launch post. As I said, we need to find a more consistent approach on growth, If any of you has any new idea or has heard of approaches of how could we get more people to realize they’re overpaying (some even pay 7% annual fees!) and get them to know and trust our solution, that would be awesome, but anyway, I’m eager to read and respond to whatever this great community has to say.
48 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 97.2 ms ] threadA lot of ETF funds here play a bit of an educational mission. They have regular commentaries and features on financial media, often around ‘demistifying investing’ and always talk to how passive is so much better than active+fees.
I’ve often been shocked at how low the level of financial literacy is amongst even highly educated people. The standard passive marketing pitch appeals to them because it’s so much less opaque than active approaches.
I’ve long wanted to do something similar in South Africa. I think the key is ease of setup and building in scheduled contributions. If your customers are putting in a set amount each month then your revenue grows year on year even if your market share stalls.
About taxes, I think Chile is on the lower-burden side of Latin American countries, but I'm open to hear if you have deeper insights.
Apparently not for Brasil yet, but definitely a product we need here. I would use something like it, but the only option in the space is a new startup (https://oiwarren.com/) with horrible UX (every form emulates a natural language chat bot, which makes muuuch longer to fill out simple fields that a regular <form> would take seconds).
Other than that, only brokers with very user-unfriendly online interfaces.
Easy, simple, wealth management is very much needed in here. I hope you do well enough in Chile to consider a expansion here.
My understanding is that Betterment and Wealthfront are primarily aimed for upper middle-class millennials who have some savings but are not extraordinarily wealthy so as to have their own family office or dedicated wealth management team in Morgan Stanley / Goldman Sachs / JP Morgan / etc.
Since the upper middle-class in LATAM is significantly smaller than that of the US due to greater inequality, are you going after higher net worth individuals?
Anyway, we know we will be able to expand from this market to higher net worth individuals because a good part of them are also being ripped off by banks.
Also this is available for Chile only? I'm in Bolivia, will be able to invest?
The site needs communication work.
Yes, we use $ for peso and US$ for dollars because that's what our current customers would expect. We might have to localize the page once we grow.
I feel putting CLP$ would be confusing for them now!
As far as I know, it's the same for other LatAm countries because "$" originates from the coat of arms of the Spanish Empire:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_sign#Pillars_of_Hercule...
Additionally, I am working with a SF based e-lender www.pimes.com whose primary market is LATAM (Starting with Colombia, expanding to Chile and Peru soon), perhaps we could talk about some partnership opportunities there. My profile has my personal email if you feel like talking more about it.
Overall very impressed though! Awesome to see this sort of stuff launching in markets outside of the US.
Entiendo la mayoria de las decisiones que tomaron ya, desde el diseño hasta el armado de perfil de usuario.
Se vienen varios problemas a mente, que me pregunto como resolvieron: el costo de transferencias entre bancos desde sudamerica a estados unidos para los montos que se transfieren terminan comiendos e mucha rentabilidad. (i.e. no podes depositar de a 500 dolares por mes, por ej). Otro gran problema es lo legal: argentina por ejemplo siempre termina poniendo restricciones de algun tipo. Hay mucho riesgo monetario tambien entre que se deposita en la cuenta y se compran los correspondientes ETF.
Mi pregunta es: mas alla de posicionamiento de mercado, como van a lograr ser competitivos considerando todas estas desventajas de infraestructura? Donde esta la innovacion?
Porque no usar fondos al estilo Vanguard de una? Super low costo y revender esos paquetes?
Muy bueno igual, y voy a estar mirandolos.
- Fondo Mutuo Fintual Risky Norris - Fondo Mutuo Fintual Moderate Pitt - Fondo Mutuo Fintual Conservative Clooney
Y asignarle a cada cliente una combinación de estos tres. De esta manera, se pagan comisiones como si fuera un gran cliente. Esto compite muy bien con las alternativas: al menos en Chile estamos listados como la solución retail más económica según El Mercurio Inversiones.
El gran costo inicial que tuvimos que asumir con este approach es el de la regulación, pues como creadores de Fondos Mutuos debemos cumplir con una serie de exigencias, y justamente ahí está la innovación: somos capaces de cumplir con ella sin arrastrar con el costo operativo porque automatizamos casi todos los procesos y la generación de los documentos que requiere la autoridad en nuestro caso no depende de personas.
- ¿Porqué Fondos Mutuos y no Fondos de Inversión? ¿Fue para dar mayor liquidez a los clientes? (Entiendo que los Fondos de Inversión tienen un beneficio tributario que no existe en FFMM).
- Al parecer sólo invierten en ETF de USA, específicamente del S&P 500 para el fondo riesgoso ¿Planean cambiar ésto en un futuro?
- Si cobran 1,19% de remuneración fija ¿Cómo es que en sus folletos informativos sale un monto menor de tasa anual de costos? Me imagino que los costos bancarios por transferencia + de administración de ETF + transaccionales deberían influir en dar un TAC mayor.
-¿Existe un proceso automatizado de inversión desde el punto de vista cliente? (Por ejemplo un cobro automático bancario todos los meses a la misma fecha)
Nuevamente felicitaciones por el proyecto!
Respondiendo punto por punto:
- Usando fondos mutuos podemos pagar rescate de las inversiones en 3 días habiles, fondos de inversión tiene que ser sobre 10 días. Tanto fondos mutuos como de inversión tienen beneficios tributarios, creemos que los que aplican a fondos mutuos responden mucho mejor a inversiones de patrimonios menores a US$500k (en nuestro caso, beneficios como 57 LIR, 108 LIR y APV).
- Tendremos carteras diversificadas (no expuesto a ninguna empresa particular más de 3% por ejemplo), y vamos a ir diversificando más geográficamente a medida que vayamos aumentando la parrilla de ETFs. En la parrilla actual hay ETFs de acciones emergentes, deuda emergente, acciones globales, etc, y el algoritmo de asset allocation es el que elige cual entra y cual no. No han entrado ETFs fuera de US porque probablemente tengamos que aumentar la parrilla con ETFs que cubren zonas más puntuales o correlacionan muy distinto con el mercado de US.
- Cobramos hasta 1,19% de remuneración, puede ser menos. Nosotros cubrimos costos bancarios por transferencia y costos de transacciones de ETFs (corretaje). Lo único que no cubrimos es el management fee de los ETFs contenidos dentro de las carteras, que usualmente es muy bajo.
- Lo que sugerimos es agendar una transferencia programada desde el banco de cada cliente, nosotros detectamos las transferencias y las asociamos automáticamente cuando llegan.
Also, I'm getting a 422 error when trying to sign up. The error page doesn't say much, just:
¡Ouch! El cambio que intentaste hacer fue rechazado. A lo mejor trataste de cambiar algo para lo que no tienes acceso.
My thought is people are averse to fees - but there needs to be a bit more of an impetus for someone to switch to your platform. Will you be using ETFs to gain exposures? If so, a lot of the marketing could be focused on diversity of investment or saving for retirement.
A lot of the reason the robo's have taken off is that some provide "fractional ownership". So you can invest as little as $1. There is some legal and compliance issues you would need to iron out in your home country. The "Acorns" approach is a good one in my opinion. Helps you get many small accounts quickly.
Ultimately, performance is what a lot of people go by. You need 5 years. Once you have 1 though - with 7% fees - you can easily start showing expense ratio drags on portfolios...
About performance, I agree, it will take some time until regular people start noticing the difference.
Just wanted to write here to congratulate you and your team. I've been following what you guys have been doing for many, many years, and you have never ceased to impress me.
Since I've been living here in San Francisco, I've gotten quite into personal finance and retirement investment. I've wondered many times why my family there in Chile can't have access to some of the tools available here. Having read your post and done a bit of research the reasons seem pretty clear to me.
Thanks for working on such a meaningful solution, I've already recommended it to several family members.
Good luck to you and the team, and if I can help with anything don't hesitate and reach out :)
Best, Nicolás
Though I feel like 1.19% is a bit too much: I'm currently using Renta4.cl for ETF IPSA from Itaú (CFMITNIPSA, 0.6%) and Interactive Brokers for Irish All-World ETF from Vanguard (VWRD, 0.25%).
Anyway, I'm just picky because I have a choice. Meanwhile, the average person in Latin America definitely needs better instruments for investing. Best of luck to the team!
Another I miss, and have to start tracking on my own is the fluctuations of my investment. I am a bit of a control freak and keep an spreadsheet with the percentage earned each day. It be great to have that info within the platform. Every time I show it to my friends they seem to trust the platform a bit more. That’s another... more data, easier it is to influence others to join.
Sorry if this seems like a feature request! :P
I have been in financial services strategy for quite a while now in various parts of the retail banking world and have been leading customer acquisition for both cards and retail banking in general. You're right - distribution is a big challenge but another big challenge is getting people to trust you with their money.
For me, you can either build the trust on your own (hard) or rely on your existing customers to help funnel the trust (i.e. referral schemes). Case studies, online calculators, customer videos speaking about the product, partnerships (have to be careful that this is a win-win) are some tactics you can think about.
Other questions for thought: - Does the government in Chile provide deposit guarantees? (i.e. if you go bankrupt, does the govt pay back the depositors a certain percentage?) - Can you convince people to move just a small percentage of their savings? Are you expecting people to use your platform for 100% of their investments or can you get people to consider you as part of their wider investment strategy? - Can your existing customers help in some way or form (i.e. referral scheme, communities, etc.)?
Wealthsimple is a great company that you can look to emulate as they do automated investments for Canadians.
Monzo is another great one. Based in the UK, their acquisition growth has been incredible with minimal marketing. Effectively, relying on word of mouth and a great product experience.
If you wanted to discuss more, happy to talk it through my experiences in Canada and the UK