Why not have ownership diversity requirements. The larger the company is the more voting shareholders it's required to have. With limits on total ownership by individuals. The larger something becomes the more democratic it becomes.
Because they are just communists that think giving it a cute name makes it new and palatable. It's just despotism sold under the ruberic of eat the rich political. Same Marxist different day.
2 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 7.3 ms ] thread