Ask HN: Why do companies do “remote within the US”?
I was even employed part-time with a company that knew I was in Mexico and was OK with it, but then they got bought and I was terminated within months. All my papers are in order, my US Passport is still good, my Mexican visa is fine, and I can't honestly think of a reason why they can't hire remote globally. Am I missing something? Is there a reason for this I don't understand? I have a US bank account, a US Passport, pay US taxes, and am a native English speaker. Is there a blind spot that I can't see? Is it just simple "policy" that people made a blanket decision without facts? Am I being unreasonable?
It seems like a reasonable thing to be upset over. It feels like discrimination, and it is. It's called Geographic Discrimination, and when you're talking about being a concierge for a hotel or a janitor or any other physical on-site job, that makes sense. But I don't understand why it should be legal to apply it to 100% remote jobs in 100% remote companies.
19 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 63.4 ms ] threadBut I'm talking about totally asynchronous work that's just an assignment given to you, and you turn it in completed later.
Having fully remote employees within the US is a large burden in and of itself. It is very very hard unless a company has resources that can address that. Each employee in a different state or location is basically treated like a separate office. You are basically asking a company to open an office in Mexico.
First and foremost is why remote is so slow to catch on everywhere. Every manager has to deal with cognitive load, and a limited capability to exceed it. Getting the money to hire somebody at a given rate is hard enough, but then interviewing, weighing how much difficulty will be involved in day-to-day managing this hire, is all factored in, and all adds to the cognitive load.
A lot of "100% remote" isn't. They want these hires, if for some reason it became necessary, to be able to travel to the main office (and to travel to meet them). They want to be able to pay them without any unanswered questions. They don't want a cultural or language barrier. The fact is, even if you have all these bases covered, and you are a US citizen, they have trouble taking you at your word just because "foreign", and it's a load off to just tell you no.
If someone emailed me a Mexican phone number, even though it may be as easy as just punching it in, most managers would not want to.
Companies are set up to do US taxes, and don't want to deal with foreign taxes. Even if Mexico has zero foreign tax filing requirements, the US probably has a form to fill out.
A US PO box can cost under $20 per 6 months, and many of the cheapest ones are along the US/Mexico border. Take a road trip and use that PO box as the address on your resume. Have a phone number that doesn't require international dialing. Don't lie about where you're from ("my mailing address is in Phoenix") but if it's 100% remote (and you have good internet) it shouldn't matter. You're a US citizen, and this would fix most of your problems.
I've had to deal with discrimination based on where I live, but at least I was showing up to the physical office as agreed. In sum, don't make it hard for them to see you as part of the organization they envisioned.
My employer doesn't have to pay Mexican taxes. I don't even have to pay Mexican taxes. They do US taxes just like for everybody else because my bank account is in the States and I'm an American.
I use Skype and Google Voice. I can give out a US phone number and receive calls just as though I were in the US.
It's just so very very frustrating.
Especially when the company I'm currently pursuing lists 'trust' in their list of 3 values.
As a manager, besides budget - the risk of delivering (or not) the project is important.
The more remote, away from home timezone, less english speaking audience is involved - the bigger the risks.
I'm even from Alabama and don't have an accent.
The risk of delivering or not shouldn't come from my geographic location. That should be susses out in the interview process or probation period.
Smaller corps has more flexibility.
As was the case for my termination a few months ago, I actually WAS working as a contractor, so that's not 100% foolproof.
I actually just recently heard about a guy who moved here. He told his boss, and his boss's boss, who were both fine with it. Then when he told HR they were like "no way, dude." But then both bosses told him "just tell HR you're moving to Florida." LOL!