Ask HN: Review my project - reportaproblem.at
I figured the reason for this is that users simply go away when something is not working, I do this myself. But what's the reason for that? It's quite cumbersome to notify the site owner: first you need to search for a contact or feedback link, and then you also need to describe what feature you're actually talking about.
So with reportaproblem you as a site owner receive a simple HTML snippet containing a "Report a problem" link that you attach next to all your important features on your web page.
When a user clicks such a link, inside the page a popover appears and you can quickly enter what's wrong without leaving the page.
I haven't (yet) put all that much effort into it, for example it probably needs a more decent navigation. I see it more like a proof of concept for now, also because I don't know whether or not it's a small and viable business idea at all.
In general, such links from reportaproblem.at are free, but I consider asking for a one-time fee to customize it (right now it's also free), and I also plan to provide additional features if it catches on.
I'm curious for your opinions. Thanks a lot!
http://www.reportaproblem.at/
22 comments
[ 7.4 ms ] story [ 64.5 ms ] threadTo be honest thats what i like about it. I like the simplicity.
Getsatisfaction and co completely miss the point and scare users off. It makes no sense to have a badge on the side. We use it in several projects. Its more a survey less a bug report channel. And the overhead of registering first keeps people out.
The benefit of the product is in two directions. First Users have a way to communicate. Second Users see that somebody would care if a problem arises.
I can imagine this product within smaller blogs/webshops and other smaller to middle-sized products.
The only problem i would see is that these pages then to be rather poorly implemented and it could easily happen that those errors break the plugin. But the user would have the same problem with all other implementations.
The JavaScript part of the link is only launched when the user clicks on it, so a bad JavaScript page shouldn't interfere with that. And even then there's an HTML fallback.
I might consider changing the name... Just doesn't feel right.
I would initially think to remove "HTML Snippet" from your page, just because the people that are likely outsourcing their problem reporting to you may be confused by that.
I would also look at how Google sells the simplicity of adsense to users to get them understand they are putting Google's code into their website (or some alternatives to "HTML Snippet"
I would also probably never offer a one time payment for this service. After your first month's fixed costs the early "one time fee" adopters are riding it out until the end for free.
Could you elaborate on what you mean by removing the HTML snippet from my page? The problem ends up being reported to the e-mail address you enter when signing up. reportaproblem is just the delivery mechanism of feedback.
Thanks for your thoughts!
There is definitely something to all of these really simple feedback, poll, bug, and feature request services. I think you should follow through with this and see where it leads.
But you're right. I have simply removed them.
While I like that you've given users the option to customize the feedback box (background, text colors) I'm still not the biggest fan of the styling for the box - I'd much prefer to have a centered box, more in the style of Fancybox.
I did that now. Better?