8 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 24.5 ms ] thread
If anybody has a meatier link, please post it. This was the first article I found from a tech-oriented source.
Better link: https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/national-security/five-....

Relevant text here would be:

""" Encryption

18 Encryption is vital to the digital economy, a secure cyberspace and the protection of personal, commercial and government information. The five countries have no interest or intention to weaken encryption mechanisms. We recognise, however, that encryption, including end-to-end encryption, is also used in the conduct of terrorist and criminal activities. The inability of intelligence and law enforcement agencies to lawfully access encrypted data and communications poses challenges to law enforcement agencies' efforts to protect our communities. Therefore, we agreed to the urgent need for law enforcement to gain targeted access to data, subject to strict safeguards, legal limitations, and respective domestic consultations. We have agreed to a Statement of Principles on Access to Evidence and Encryption (https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/national-security/five-.... ) that sets out a framework for discussion with industry on resolving the challenges to lawful access posed by encryption, while respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms. """

> targeted access to data

> subject to strict safeguards

> legal limitations

> domestic consultations

Great joke!

Encryption, when governments are involved, is a losing battle I've come to realize. If a couple of researchers could come up with inherent flaws in CPU architecture then I am pretty sure a government spending millions of dollars for years had done the same. It's like trying to fortify a castle built on sand.