I read the whole thing, and I still don't get why anyone is interested. Maeve Brennan, her columns, her life — all of it seems trivial in an especially dull way. Maybe the writer of this piece was unable to convey her interest in as artistic a way as they wished to, and should have told the simple facts instead of trying to construct atmosphere.
The atmosphere is the thing here, along with the character sketch of a person. It's the age-old process of trying to look inside someone's head to feel as they feel.
From the opening few paragraphs I suspect she was one of those people with intense in-person charisma, or as we call it round here, "reality distortion field".
7 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 24.3 ms ] threadFrom the opening few paragraphs I suspect she was one of those people with intense in-person charisma, or as we call it round here, "reality distortion field".
Waifish is almost always used with this definition from my experience. I'd even argue the first 2 definitions are archaic at this point.