[–] java-man 7y ago ↗ if one looks at the history, the answer is a clear NO. [–] lsm 7y ago ↗ History of people attempting to charge for using a browser? [–] java-man 7y ago ↗ history of people preferring 'free' products with ads/tracking over paid software. browsers, email clients, encyclopedias, you name it. [–] lsm 7y ago ↗ That's very true. So the evil is not Chrome then :)
[–] lsm 7y ago ↗ History of people attempting to charge for using a browser? [–] java-man 7y ago ↗ history of people preferring 'free' products with ads/tracking over paid software. browsers, email clients, encyclopedias, you name it. [–] lsm 7y ago ↗ That's very true. So the evil is not Chrome then :)
[–] java-man 7y ago ↗ history of people preferring 'free' products with ads/tracking over paid software. browsers, email clients, encyclopedias, you name it. [–] lsm 7y ago ↗ That's very true. So the evil is not Chrome then :)
[–] JoshTriplett 7y ago ↗ A browser needs to be trustworthy and transparent; anything that isn't fully Open Source is simply not fit for purpose.Just use Firefox. [–] lsm 7y ago ↗ But, the Chrome does have better UX than Firefox.
[–] hsnewman 7y ago ↗ The assumption is that chrome is evil, without justification. Regardless, what about chromium (open source, free)? http://www.chromium.org/ [–] lsm 7y ago ↗ I’m using that too. Also try the new opera
[–] gaspoweredcat 7y ago ↗ nope there are plenty of other options but you know what, i dont really care, maybe im evil too but im not going to bother switching
11 comments
[ 9.1 ms ] story [ 206 ms ] threadJust use Firefox.