There are no "autonomous class" cars, so that is complete and utter marketing wank, doesn't even belong in the title of a fluff piece. I'm sure it's a nice chip, but a processor tuned to run vaporware is tuned for a guess.
From the article, I could not tell if it was silicon-proven or just a reference design made available.
Anyway, the safety emphasis mentioned sounds good, and the quoted reason makes sense: "If consumers don’t trust the autonomous systems in their cars are safe, then mass market acceptance of this technology will be slow to happen."
2 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 19.0 ms ] threadFrom the article, I could not tell if it was silicon-proven or just a reference design made available.
Anyway, the safety emphasis mentioned sounds good, and the quoted reason makes sense: "If consumers don’t trust the autonomous systems in their cars are safe, then mass market acceptance of this technology will be slow to happen."