[–] perl4ever 7y ago ↗ This is a particularly irritating example of Betteridge's law of headlines. We already were aware of objects that may have been perturbed by planet X, and discovering another doesn't make a qualitative difference that I can see. [–] vikingo9 7y ago ↗ Seems to me that the more evidence the more likely we will have the definitive statement "planet X exist" which is currently not the case
[–] vikingo9 7y ago ↗ Seems to me that the more evidence the more likely we will have the definitive statement "planet X exist" which is currently not the case
2 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 16.5 ms ] thread