[–] beaner 7y ago ↗ The title says "data breach," but that's not what actually happened. They had a security vulnerability and fixed it. Yes, that's bad, but the title makes it sound like it was exploited, which would have been worse. [–] Latteland 7y ago ↗ And where's the dup entry? [–] guessmyname 7y ago ↗ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169027https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169732https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169266 [–] Latteland 7y ago ↗ but none of those are the techcrunch article.
[–] Latteland 7y ago ↗ And where's the dup entry? [–] guessmyname 7y ago ↗ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169027https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169732https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169266 [–] Latteland 7y ago ↗ but none of those are the techcrunch article.
[–] guessmyname 7y ago ↗ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169027https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169732https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169266 [–] Latteland 7y ago ↗ but none of those are the techcrunch article.
[–] EDD0DFFFh 7y ago ↗ Well, this is more... important reason to shut down G+, than because of non-popularity and lack of users.
6 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 29.0 ms ] threadhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169732
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18169266