Why do incoming spam SMS cost money in the US?
I'm originally from Europe, where strong consumer protection laws make it free to receive SMS.
Here in the US I activated a prepaid plan, which charges $0.20 per SMS, including incoming ones.
The problem is that the phone number I got must have been used in the past, because I receive tons of confirmation SMS and marketing spam, which all are charged against my plan.
How is this legal? I purchase $10.00 of credit and it gets spent on nothing I personally did, with no way for me to block it.
This looks really punitive to the people who cannot afford the $19.00 option for unlimited text!
Are there ways to deal with this situation? If not, how can I help the US society to change this practice?
16 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 73.2 ms ] threadIn general, essentially everyone in the US has an unlimited message plan, and if not, many carriers don't charge for incoming. My recommendation to how to fix this is to vote with your wallet. Switch to a prepaid provider with better SMS rules.
I'm assuming based on the $0.20/message cost, that you're using AT&T prepaid, which has some of the highest SMS fees for prepaid plans.
All the text spam I get is from random ten digit numbers, a new one every time.
You can text the spam message to SPAM (7726) and it'll ask you for the number that sent it. I've no idea how effective those reports are, though.
That is why I specified "automated," as Twilio even seems to implement it automatically for any messages sent via the API.
It also doesn't help spam sent from physical phones with unlimited plans, and custom apps built to mass text though.
What I question is the fact that I have no control on incoming SMS, and still I get charged for them.
Most of the 4-5 digit numbers mention the STOP options, but I get messages from 10-digit numbers like the following:
"Tracie! Breaking report: This fruit burns up to 10lbs of fat in 14 days! Enjoy this special update here al49.xyz/ketonews"
The same message, a different number every time. Basically everyone in the US is forced to have unlimited text and calls in order not to pay for incoming marketing, how fair is this?
It seems to be personalized to the previous holder of the number, who I assume is named 'Tracie.' I'd see if you're able to get another phone number, as this 'Tracie' was quite liberal with giving out their number to anyone and anything.
$500 per message fine. I think the issue is enforcement
The idea that someone can cost you money without your consent is insane. I vaguely recall incoming calls also costing money when I first came here - and I got a lot as the previous owner of the number clearly hadn’t been paying bills...
I feel the rate of spam would decrease somewhat if telcos in the US were not permitted to charge for receiving calls or text messages. (Maybe the latter “service” messages requiring an explicit acceptance message before they’re allowed to charge?)