That’s an excellent point I hadn’t thought of before. On the other hand, if a consumer knows about a drug that the dr doesn’t offer but they think they should have, that could be valuable too.
True, but that type of decision requires a level of expertise that most consumers do not have . . . and those consumers that do, will have done the research to obtain the requisite information on their own. That data will be far more useful in coming up with a treatment plan with their physician.
Agreed, but the consumer who does the research, does need to find out what options are available. Does that mean advertising on TV is not allowed but advertising on the internet is? I don’t have an answer but it’s an interesting question and probably one component of the reason why our drug and medical system is broken in the US.
At first glance, this sounds like a positive thing to me. However I disagree with most of the administrations actions. So I’m wondering what’s the catch? Can anyone share some pros and cons with me?
This could arguably be a good thing.
Announcing drug prices would force people to pay closer attention to the typically crappy coverage by their insurance companies - where a generic alternative somehow costs more for the consumer than brand-name...
10 comments
[ 5.2 ms ] story [ 68.6 ms ] thread