[–] ASipos 7y ago ↗ This is old news. Also, slightly misleading, since it suggests to those that know the old news that MS has released later DOS source code, i.e. 6.22.
[–] ineedasername 7y ago ↗ Is this practical for anything at this point? [–] ineedasername 7y ago ↗ I meant this as an honest question. Are there practical uses for this beyond "huh, that's interesting". I can't think of any, but I'm not knowledgeable on OS design, so I'm honestly asking the question. [–] 3KQgt0Cl 7y ago ↗ Educational purposes I suppose.
[–] ineedasername 7y ago ↗ I meant this as an honest question. Are there practical uses for this beyond "huh, that's interesting". I can't think of any, but I'm not knowledgeable on OS design, so I'm honestly asking the question. [–] 3KQgt0Cl 7y ago ↗ Educational purposes I suppose.
[–] FahadUddin92 7y ago ↗ So it was built on Assembly language? Always thought it was built using BASIC. [–] klez 7y ago ↗ Why would you think that?Are you sure you're not thinking of something like the Commodore 64 that dropped you inside a BASIC interpreter after boot? [–] FahadUddin92 7y ago ↗ I got it confused with Altair BASIC which gates used to work on.
[–] klez 7y ago ↗ Why would you think that?Are you sure you're not thinking of something like the Commodore 64 that dropped you inside a BASIC interpreter after boot? [–] FahadUddin92 7y ago ↗ I got it confused with Altair BASIC which gates used to work on.
7 comments
[ 27.9 ms ] story [ 2421 ms ] threadAre you sure you're not thinking of something like the Commodore 64 that dropped you inside a BASIC interpreter after boot?