HN Explorer

18 comments

[ 93.8 ms ] story [ 367 ms ] thread
platz
Does anyone actually use raft these days
jeremyjh
Is there another distributed consensus algorithm that you think is more prominent? Paxos is on the decline. AFAIK Raft underlies most new distributed systems. Kubernetes for example relies on etcd which is a Raft implementation.
platz
Ah, I didn't know Paxos was on the decline or that etcd uses raft
espadrine
I wouldn't call Paxos on the decline. It has several nice properties that Raft lacks[1]. However, implementing it correctly is more brutal than Raft, which is cut into easier-to-understand components.

Also, the paper introducing Paxos[2] is famously obfuscated, while the Raft website[3] trivializes the problem, and has ready-to-use libraries.

As a result, there are more recently-developed systems in Raft than Paxos, but I expect there is more volume hitting Paxos systems than Raft ones in the world.

[1]: http://rystsov.info/2017/02/15/simple-consensus.html

[2]: https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/lamport-paxos.pdf

[3]: https://raft.github.io/

evanweaver
As a member of a team that has implemented Raft in production (https://fauna.com) and in conversation with others who have, the general consensus is that Raft, Paxos, and even Viewstamped Replication are variants of the same fundamental algorithm.

There is an interesting paper about the commonalities in consensus here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5671.pdf

suj1th
Thank you for sharing an interesting paper. The similarity between Raft and Viewstamped Replication is easy to gauge. The original Raft paper too acknowledges this similarity. OTOH, the similarity between Paxos and Raft is not very apparent (to me). The paper in the link seems to predate Raft, and only considers VR, Zab and multi-Paxos.
rubiquity
> Paxos is on the decline

You really need to back up a claim like that with facts.

shanev
There’s Tendermint: https://tendermint.com/, which is gaining popularity in distributed systems projects. It’s Byzantine fault tolerant, unlike Raft and Paxos.
KirinDave
I had to get drunk after reading this.

No, Tendermint is not useful where Raft is. This is such a crass category error it makes me wonder what your actual skillset is.

shanev
Care to enlighten us without resorting to a personal attack Dave?
notduncansmith
Raft is not designed for adversarial use; while it is fault-tolerant, it is not Byzantine fault tolerant. Raft (or Paxos et al) are better suited for wholly-owned distributed databases, where a BFT consensus algorithm like Tendermint would usually be inappropriate because of the overhead of cryptographic operations. If you think a large number of your nodes might get hacked, though, you may want a blockchain anyways :)
KirinDave
After you name a system that decided to switch from a Raft-based consensus implementation to Tendermint, sure.
nine_k
A great README file, explaining things in detail, from the ground up.

Kudos.

mark_l_watson
Agreed, very nice docs, both for how it works and examples, and also for using the code.

For Haskell fans, you might also like tha Pact DLT contract language, implemented in Haskell with, Lisp syntax.

[dead] v2bridge
with comfort and get your job done systematically without a bridge of security alert. It's frustrating not getting the value of your money on services paid for. If you are in need of safe exploit in hacking, make the right decision of using v2cyberhacks and keep tab on any subjects be it spouse, employees and friends information from social media, Phones, websites and erasing of certain confidential records you don't want to be at public domain, V2cyberhacks don't brag about hack exploit it is what we do best .....mail us today at gmail v2cyberhacks We Treat Every Request With Utmost Confidentiality