> Now, Biao Wu and colleagues at Peking University have shown that the two types of algorithm are even more similar by publishing a “rigorous proof that quantum circuit algorithm can be transformed into quantum adiabatic algorithm”. This means that if one type of algorithm takes time t to solve a problem, then the other will take t multiplied by a constant.
Read more
> Wu told Physics World that the result is good news for people trying to build adiabatic quantum computers: “In principle, any quantum-computing problem can be solved using a quantum adiabatic algorithm as efficiently as using quantum circuit algorithm.
This is likely good news for companies like D-Wave that are building quantum annealing systems that execute quantum adiabatic algorithms. Whether it means they can run gate-model code on top of some abstraction is beyond me - would love to get a take on it from some of the quantum folks here.
1 comment
[ 5.1 ms ] story [ 7.0 ms ] thread> Now, Biao Wu and colleagues at Peking University have shown that the two types of algorithm are even more similar by publishing a “rigorous proof that quantum circuit algorithm can be transformed into quantum adiabatic algorithm”. This means that if one type of algorithm takes time t to solve a problem, then the other will take t multiplied by a constant. Read more
> Wu told Physics World that the result is good news for people trying to build adiabatic quantum computers: “In principle, any quantum-computing problem can be solved using a quantum adiabatic algorithm as efficiently as using quantum circuit algorithm.
This is likely good news for companies like D-Wave that are building quantum annealing systems that execute quantum adiabatic algorithms. Whether it means they can run gate-model code on top of some abstraction is beyond me - would love to get a take on it from some of the quantum folks here.