[–] sebst 7y ago ↗ Inappropriate market timing ;) [–] mimixco 7y ago ↗ Indeed. I think the general consensus is that ICO's are dead in light of the current securities requirements. [–] zefram_l 7y ago ↗ Which makes it a good time to start poking fun at ICOs, which is what GetRichQuick is doing, right? [–] tanseydavid 7y ago ↗ I thought it was going to make me rich with a 32x32 icon. :( [–] jansan 7y ago ↗ Exactly, time to use the word "ICO" for what it was initially intended for. Good old icons, but only bitmap and no larger than 256x256 pixels.
[–] mimixco 7y ago ↗ Indeed. I think the general consensus is that ICO's are dead in light of the current securities requirements. [–] zefram_l 7y ago ↗ Which makes it a good time to start poking fun at ICOs, which is what GetRichQuick is doing, right? [–] tanseydavid 7y ago ↗ I thought it was going to make me rich with a 32x32 icon. :( [–] jansan 7y ago ↗ Exactly, time to use the word "ICO" for what it was initially intended for. Good old icons, but only bitmap and no larger than 256x256 pixels.
[–] zefram_l 7y ago ↗ Which makes it a good time to start poking fun at ICOs, which is what GetRichQuick is doing, right? [–] tanseydavid 7y ago ↗ I thought it was going to make me rich with a 32x32 icon. :( [–] jansan 7y ago ↗ Exactly, time to use the word "ICO" for what it was initially intended for. Good old icons, but only bitmap and no larger than 256x256 pixels.
[–] tanseydavid 7y ago ↗ I thought it was going to make me rich with a 32x32 icon. :( [–] jansan 7y ago ↗ Exactly, time to use the word "ICO" for what it was initially intended for. Good old icons, but only bitmap and no larger than 256x256 pixels.
[–] jansan 7y ago ↗ Exactly, time to use the word "ICO" for what it was initially intended for. Good old icons, but only bitmap and no larger than 256x256 pixels.
[–] gammateam 7y ago ↗ Why does it convert everything to DAI and not let people pay with DAI? Seems really backwards:“hey here are these 42 tokens we accept but no stablecoinsAlthough we convert to a stablecoin”That actually does make this funnier, since it even accepts Maker, which is the governance token for DAI, but no DAILooking forward to seeing how much gas this uses, this might be more fully featured than the OpenZeppelin contract [–] zefram_l 7y ago ↗ It does support DAI payment, maybe you missed it in the dropdown? It's between Chainlink & Substratum :) TUSD is also supported I think
[–] zefram_l 7y ago ↗ It does support DAI payment, maybe you missed it in the dropdown? It's between Chainlink & Substratum :) TUSD is also supported I think
7 comments
[ 5.9 ms ] story [ 25.4 ms ] thread“hey here are these 42 tokens we accept but no stablecoins
Although we convert to a stablecoin”
That actually does make this funnier, since it even accepts Maker, which is the governance token for DAI, but no DAI
Looking forward to seeing how much gas this uses, this might be more fully featured than the OpenZeppelin contract