Ask HN: What are search tools that works for the average user?
These engines work if the user know how to search and who write content knows how to be found. If you look at the searches of a person that was not using the Internet until 6-10 years ago, they are not trained to search on those engines. You would be amazed looking at what they type in a search box.. Unfortunately, Google “delivers” on those queries so they do not have to learn.
And by the way, we all became spoiled by Google a little bit. For example I rarely end up changing my query on Google to find what I want while I used to have to try at least 4 or 5 similar phrases before.
Confluence wiki's I think is based on Lucene and the search is terrible even if you know how to search.
Try to put "tool to fix a clog" in Amazon and contextualwebsearch.com (I think they use Lucene) to laugh out loud. Compare them with Google. Bing does pretty well too on this query.
Is there anything that goes even close? I prefer something opensource but I am open to close source solutions.
8 comments
[ 8.8 ms ] story [ 39.9 ms ] threadFor finding stuff:, sometimes moderation is needed. Check Information Architecture articles to see how to index and catalog information. Some solutions are: site maps, and an alphabetical index, metadata, etc. And as mentioned, sometimes the best solution relies in: Mods and curators.
You can read more about the differences on Quora, our CTO answered there a few years ago: https://www.quora.com/How-does-Elasticsearch-relate-and-or-c...
I usually test a few alternative and see how they work and pick one base on some criteria. The main reason I did not did that this time is that I could not see anything that seem going a lot further than the usual ES.
I am curious to hear from somebody that had the same problem and found a satisfactory solution. It would also be interesting to hear from those that tried with modest results and hear what they end up setting on.