Why the media is unable to report on a case that has generated huge interest (theage.com.au)

The Age is lamenting not being able to talk about a case because it's under a supression order due to a second trial in March. However other entities not bound by the supression order including overseas papers and twitter have made this somewhat meaningless.

I can't help but wonder what the solution is to the "twitter prejudicing juries" problem.

Interestingly, Wikipedia editors also don't seem sure how best to deal with this suppression order. Here's the talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:George_Pell#Rumours_of_co...