Ask YC: If you could create the ultimate tech news site what would it look like?
People bag on some of the News sites for being to fluffy, too gossip filled, etc...
I've just started a site to cover technology and startups in the Midwest: http://windywire.com and I'm looking for feedback to create the type of site we'd all like to see.
So I'm coming to you guys for feedback, what features, what style of writing, what mashups would you like to see in a tech news site?
15 comments
[ 5.2 ms ] story [ 50.9 ms ] threadOne thing I don't like is articles that are purely about business cycles. Company A raised 10 million dollars, or is dead, or is running out of money, or is being acquired. Somtimes that can be interesting, but I'm partial to writers that have a sense of humor, and are good at putting things into perspective. I like writing from guys like Zed Shaw, or Matt Maroon -- they're enterntaining.
AFAIK no one has done white label social news yet. startup?
Today, technology news has a problem: people who might know what they're talking about don't write. Blogs are somewhat better but the blogger doesn't have an incentive to collect opposing points of view or do boring fact-checking or tedious testing.
I see a lot of people saying that the comments are the best part of the article. This is wrong. You only feel this way because tech reporting is so degraded.
What I would like: a news site that figures out some way to make money off rare information and insightful reporting. One half Consumer Reports, one half the Marc Andressen blog. Even if this resulted in there being just a few posts per day, I think I would read it. Plus, on the web, quality information can rake in pageviews over a long period of time, so this strategy isn't economic suicide. It does take a longer time to pay off.
Maybe there are a few sites like this today, such as Tom's Hardware or Ars Technica, but I am not much of a hardware guy. I deal with web software, and the writing around that topic seems to be decidedly fluffy.
If the articles instead brought difficult epiphanies, and challenging tasks, one might find it in them to attend to one's work first, and tackle some of the 'new articles' (say, a new fascicle from Knuth) later.
We don't get this often. We dont' have one person talking about a product's design and another person about its performance and a third person about the sort of community it's developed. We get one or another, and it's never organized.
I love reading about design, less so about pure opinion on subjects. Having multiple takes on tech would be a very cool feature that I've never seen on a site before.