I'm still facepalming GP because the associative and communative properties of algebra are omitted. Add in a nonlinear solver and you can reduce th problem size considerably.
The article looks like an interesting approach but it gives every impression of being a "cul-da-sac", an effort that wasn't followed up on. Google scholar shows this article cited by four other articles - and those article not cited by anything more.
Some way of figuring out what articles matter in GP would be very useful.
7 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 27.7 ms ] threadhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.394....
The article looks like an interesting approach but it gives every impression of being a "cul-da-sac", an effort that wasn't followed up on. Google scholar shows this article cited by four other articles - and those article not cited by anything more.
Some way of figuring out what articles matter in GP would be very useful.
Differential Equations and PDEs would be a good option too.
https://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/papers/gecco12benchmarks3.pdf
http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/wjaskowski/archives/wp-publicati...
While I think that the situation is improving, we are still far from a common set of benchmarks used by the entire GP community.