Ask HN: Is there a better way for HN comment voting to work?
I really enjoy the conversations I see and engage with on Hacker News. However, the way that downvoting works seems to miss an opportunity for more productive discussion.
I often find that something I've said is downvoted, and I have no idea what objection they could have (e.g. I am sharing a personal experience without a value judgement or opinion).
One potential solution I've thought of is to require users to either upvote a reply, or write their own, before they may downvote a post.
I'm interested to see what other solutions could be considered for this issue. Maybe some people are abusing the feature as a form of "double upvote", and maybe solving that some other way would be less heavy-handed.
2 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 19.3 ms ] threadRead the comments section of the guidelines[0]. Which says that disagreement should be commented on in a clear, direct, polite manner.
A down-vote is for flagging an improper comment. Regardless of how much you disagree, if the comment could have merit from another viewpoint it doesn't warrent a downvote.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html