Ask HN: Is there a better way for HN comment voting to work?

1 points by microcolonel ↗ HN
I really enjoy the conversations I see and engage with on Hacker News. However, the way that downvoting works seems to miss an opportunity for more productive discussion.

I often find that something I've said is downvoted, and I have no idea what objection they could have (e.g. I am sharing a personal experience without a value judgement or opinion).

One potential solution I've thought of is to require users to either upvote a reply, or write their own, before they may downvote a post.

I'm interested to see what other solutions could be considered for this issue. Maybe some people are abusing the feature as a form of "double upvote", and maybe solving that some other way would be less heavy-handed.

2 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 19.3 ms ] thread
I think down-votes should count half as much as up-votes. Often for controversial topics posts that go against the consensus will get more down-votes than up-votes
Despite being geometrically opposite, a down-vote is not the opposite of an up-vote. An upvote is for agreement or whatever else you choose it to mean.

Read the comments section of the guidelines[0]. Which says that disagreement should be commented on in a clear, direct, polite manner.

A down-vote is for flagging an improper comment. Regardless of how much you disagree, if the comment could have merit from another viewpoint it doesn't warrent a downvote.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html