Depends on how you express those graphs. From a western perspective it means the rich taking most of the gains of the last 30 years and sprinkling the remaining gains across the developing world. Go to millennials, who are the first western generation to be poorer than their parents, and explain to them how great this deal is!
The thing is, it depends on your perspective. Local to America, yes there is a vanishing middle class.
Globally, yes there is a lift out of poverty.
Ideally we would see a global lift out of poverty without any local negative impacts re middle/upper classes - everybody rising to the same level instead of some rising and some falling. It's also a lot easier to rise out of poverty when it takes relatively little advancement, and easier to fall into poverty when it takes relatively little loss.
I think that aspect of things is often overlooked - poverty doesn't mean the same thing everywhere, and middle class doesn't mean the same thing everywhere. Some areas are rising, but some are falling - as a sum, things are rising.
It's the same thing as global warming - yeah, some areas are getting colder instead of warmer and this is pointed to as being evidence of global warming == false, but global warming refers to on average across the whole globe not just a single region.
People tend to conflate their local with the global, sometimes because they just miss it and sometimes deliberately.
The "exploiting xenophobia" explanation rings hollow.
The mainstream media has long been the lapdog and mouthpiece of the elite (deep state)--see Operation Mockingbird, which continues to this day.
It serves the purposes of our masters to keep us divided and fearful (as well as only "bad news" making the buck), but it's not xenophobia they're pushing, it's a generally negative view of reality to keep us discouraged and turning to them for leadership.
9 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 36.2 ms ] threadhttps://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/2/16868838/el...
Globally, yes there is a lift out of poverty.
Ideally we would see a global lift out of poverty without any local negative impacts re middle/upper classes - everybody rising to the same level instead of some rising and some falling. It's also a lot easier to rise out of poverty when it takes relatively little advancement, and easier to fall into poverty when it takes relatively little loss.
I think that aspect of things is often overlooked - poverty doesn't mean the same thing everywhere, and middle class doesn't mean the same thing everywhere. Some areas are rising, but some are falling - as a sum, things are rising.
It's the same thing as global warming - yeah, some areas are getting colder instead of warmer and this is pointed to as being evidence of global warming == false, but global warming refers to on average across the whole globe not just a single region.
People tend to conflate their local with the global, sometimes because they just miss it and sometimes deliberately.
https://momsguidetotravel.com/bill-gates-and-the-global-poor...
Bill Gates predicts that by 2035, “there will be almost no poor countries left in the world.”
I'd never heard that. Great news!
The mainstream media has long been the lapdog and mouthpiece of the elite (deep state)--see Operation Mockingbird, which continues to this day.
It serves the purposes of our masters to keep us divided and fearful (as well as only "bad news" making the buck), but it's not xenophobia they're pushing, it's a generally negative view of reality to keep us discouraged and turning to them for leadership.