I dont understand what provlem this service would solve?
Also, nginx:latest doesnt work with error WebSocket connection to 'wss://api.docker-run.com/' failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 502
Didn't work for me either. First time I tried nothing happened - just hung, the second time it started to build an nginx container but failed with a permission denied error. Also the only link that works is the link to Github.
I harassing hou cause jour nicknamesound Line à golden vibration of paranoïa maker and Captain mine control die sitôt muselé in 3 lignes or Justin le chef peux t'aider mon gars sur suis piratée no.meviktoret je au
I presume the domain name is a violation of the Docker trademark, seeing as it could potentially be confused for an official product (as it uses the Docker name)
Not allowing people to call their custom docker tooling "docker-custom-tooling" on eg. Github seems like they're shooting themselves in the foot. Of course, it might be bad and damage their brand, but it could also enable a great ecosystem of surrounding tooling, some of which they could bless if they wanted to. Imho a poor PR move.
By no means am I a lawyer but I did a quick skim of their trademark agreement for fun:
Our Marks consist of the following registered, unregistered and/or pending trademarks, service marks and logos which are subject to change without notice: Docker, Docker “Moby Dock” whale logo and the stylist representations of a container, octopus, and other entities in our original works of authorship, DOCKER HUB, RUNHUB, LIBCONTAINER, LIBTRUST, LIBCHAN, LIBSWARM, LIBPACK, DOCKER SWARM, DOCKERIZE IT, CLAY
In this case, "Docker" is the trademark we're looking at, and specifically registered with a capital D it appears
Any permitted use must not falsely imply or suggest a sponsorship or endorsement by, or a partnership or affiliation with Docker.
I don't think the author is being malicious in any way of course but from a quick glance, I couldn't say for sure that it's not a Docker product (design guidelines aside)
The Docker mark is used only in a referential context or for naming Docker or to indicate compatibility, and not in a title of a program, domain name, website, product or service
This is essentially the key distinguisher between the parent comment and the OP's site
---
Anyway, it's not so much that I'm pro-Docker or anything, it's more that they don't really have a choice legally. If companies don't protect the use of their copyrights/trademarks etc, they are diluted and risk the chance of becoming "generic". Having said that, it can definitely go overboard and lead to frivolous DMCAs, lawsuits etc etc
All this aside, while I'm not sure I have a use for the site (most things I dockerise use a compose file w/ multiple containers), it seems like a neat project so keep it up :)
Excuse me m'y mon is 65years ils se Get listing j'y faire comptable and buy so.e crédit t.i Gartner finance bag switch, i dont mine To Get hack for m'y posé et je but what thé moi t To funk thé end of Life of cold lady croling under début crédit and crisis
Je hou canehelp me i dont sa t To gointothis hackbattle causeim notinto internet ut hou c1n i Snow singe whenitsbegin thé hack and spoil more chant 2000euro and Why thé house her
Je vais écrire en français par equelatablete Android es dur à gérer, j ai pas grand choseoffrirenretour à par des dossier qui me paraissent intrigant et peut-être quelaquetedu hack s avresimilairealaquetedu vrai, targetindividuale t
Placebo hou talk Line thé bouddha of tendinite h, hou hou à lot of condescendance for group of poêle who feeling affiliation hypocrisie mistral exp. I world inexistant Why hou acte liK train driver of aussitôt feeling ticket for Bahamas To slave jour skin , progresse mangé régressé history
Can you talk to the problem Docker-Run is trying to solve? It's already relatively easy to deploy docker containers today (AWS/Azure/GCP/DigitalOcean/etc) and even have them pipe to the browser like this.
Without an ecosystem of services to integrate (Identity/Storage/DB/Queue/DNS/LB/Network/etc), containers aren't awfully useful.
35 comments
[ 1.9 ms ] story [ 83.7 ms ] threadThis website is a kind of demo screen, but not fake. Actually running Docker remotely and run containers in it.
Goid luck to the dev behind it!
Eg: https://zeyxnt8hs40zr2.docker-run.com/ https://qazf5k4ow7gpz2vq.docker-run.com/
sub-domains would works, but the container will be destroyed after 120 seconds for this demo. Of course it persist in production environment (soon).
Also, nginx:latest doesnt work with error WebSocket connection to 'wss://api.docker-run.com/' failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 502
Sorry, in that time server is down due to disk space. I fixed it, so please try again.
This service will try to implement simple container management in production. Mainly for small start-ups, like Heroku.
The system is down when you tried because of disk space. I fixed it so could you try again? Sorry for the inconvenience.
Pricing is not decided. However, current ui is sucks so will show a message soon.
[1] https://www.zopyx.com/andreas-jung/contents/dont-use-docker-...
Our Marks consist of the following registered, unregistered and/or pending trademarks, service marks and logos which are subject to change without notice: Docker, Docker “Moby Dock” whale logo and the stylist representations of a container, octopus, and other entities in our original works of authorship, DOCKER HUB, RUNHUB, LIBCONTAINER, LIBTRUST, LIBCHAN, LIBSWARM, LIBPACK, DOCKER SWARM, DOCKERIZE IT, CLAY
In this case, "Docker" is the trademark we're looking at, and specifically registered with a capital D it appears
Any permitted use must not falsely imply or suggest a sponsorship or endorsement by, or a partnership or affiliation with Docker.
I don't think the author is being malicious in any way of course but from a quick glance, I couldn't say for sure that it's not a Docker product (design guidelines aside)
The Docker mark is used only in a referential context or for naming Docker or to indicate compatibility, and not in a title of a program, domain name, website, product or service
This is essentially the key distinguisher between the parent comment and the OP's site
---
Anyway, it's not so much that I'm pro-Docker or anything, it's more that they don't really have a choice legally. If companies don't protect the use of their copyrights/trademarks etc, they are diluted and risk the chance of becoming "generic". Having said that, it can definitely go overboard and lead to frivolous DMCAs, lawsuits etc etc
All this aside, while I'm not sure I have a use for the site (most things I dockerise use a compose file w/ multiple containers), it seems like a neat project so keep it up :)
The same as Heroku, provide docker-based PaaS and users would pay for their containers.
Without an ecosystem of services to integrate (Identity/Storage/DB/Queue/DNS/LB/Network/etc), containers aren't awfully useful.
What is the differentiator?
EDIT: grammar