Exactly. Thanks for submitting this link. The fact that it is aimed at non-techies and is published by a mainstream source gave me the confidence to forward it to two of my grandparents who have submitted such dna samples and basically beg them to have their (and mine and my children’s) data deleted. I have been aware of these issues for a long time and you can imagine how displeased I was to find out that 1/4 of my DNA had been signed away for little benefit.
As some recent stories showed, the problem (if any) isn’t so much your DNA, as that of relatives. Deletion requests aren’t going to be much help here, unless you can convince a rather large majority of people to follow along.
Fundamentally, this seems to be one of those “negative externalities” that you cannot protect yourself from with individual action. Nor can I think of any technological fixes that would allow these companies to continue offering the same features without storing this data. Although they could obviously offer stripped down versions where you get an analysis one and data is erased afterwards.
The only promising route I can see here is a political / legal framework establishing a transparent process with high hurdles to the use of this data. I believe other medical data is already protected in such a way, i. e. with a higher standard, and more oversight than, say, a plumber’s files or even financial data. Genetic data seems to creep people out across all typical political boundaries, and this should be an easy sell.
They already offer the option to not store raw data and just get a one time analysis. I believe the terms say they store it for 3 months, although I don’t remember exactly. That’s what I did with 23AndMe. I also falsified all the personal information I could except for approximate age, gender, and ethnicity since I figure that affects the readings. Doesn’t help me if my extended family decides to use the kits, but it seemed an acceptable middle ground to satisfy my curiosity of trying the service myself with my paranoia about how they would use my data.
5 comments
[ 5.7 ms ] story [ 23.7 ms ] threadFundamentally, this seems to be one of those “negative externalities” that you cannot protect yourself from with individual action. Nor can I think of any technological fixes that would allow these companies to continue offering the same features without storing this data. Although they could obviously offer stripped down versions where you get an analysis one and data is erased afterwards.
The only promising route I can see here is a political / legal framework establishing a transparent process with high hurdles to the use of this data. I believe other medical data is already protected in such a way, i. e. with a higher standard, and more oversight than, say, a plumber’s files or even financial data. Genetic data seems to creep people out across all typical political boundaries, and this should be an easy sell.