9 comments

[ 2.2 ms ] story [ 39.2 ms ] thread
Curious that the announcement came from the PM and not the Minister for Home Affairs.
Yeah, right?

Maybe they lost the specifics of that pesky Paladin contract as collateral damage from the hackers' actions.

I really wish they would name the 'sophisticated state actor', I don't understand why they don't make that part public. I'm guessing it's either Russia or China, but I still wish they would name the state actor.
you think thats frustrating?

We (the business I work for) had ASIO come around, indicate that they should be meeting with top level execs, then claim in that meeting that they are aware that an external sovereign actor has hacked our network and is inside stealing our data etc.

They then refused to answer any questions about how they know this, when it happened, where it happened, how long they've known or anything AT ALL useful or precise or accurate about how we could protect ourselves.

All it did was cause rampant distrust in every direction.

I have a very low opinion of these bastards and deeply suspect them of sewing FUD deliberately in businesses.

what would Russia have to gain? my bets are China. They really act with impunity in this region of the world.
Convenient timing considering the biggest state and federal election are coming within 2 months.

It's also a bit rich from a Parliament which only had recently voted to water down cybersecurity in Australia and throw the tech industry under a bus so they could pretend to be tough on crime when it's more about outing political leaks and whistleblowers.

We'd hate to leave you unprotected over Christmas, so we're going to pass these crazy laws to secretly hack all your machines, for security! You can have complete trust in us, we're the government!

Ooops, our pants fell down again!