Ask HN: What Is a Good Daylight/SAD Lamp?

I've used the Philips Bright Light HF 3304. It appears they don't sell it anymore, though. Philips light therapy lamps: https://www.usa.philips.com/c-m-pe/light-therapy

Do consider therapy, a new relationship and/or a new job though.

I've used a Lumie Bodyclock Starter 30 as my alarm clock for over 10 years. It's completely transformed my morning. Stick it on a bedside table and its alarm function simulates a sunrise over 30 minutes.

I like to stimulate the appropriate photodetectors directly. I have a bank of blue leds aimed at my white ceiling. They are on for 12 minutes every 2 hours for the 12 daylight hours (7 times a day). The first lightcycle in the morning is for 24 minutes as the 12 minutes did not seem to be enough.

the Daylight by uplift technologies usually in the $100 range on amazon. According to a psychiatrist i spoke with this model is what was used in some of the studies showing the benefits of bright light therapy. I've used it for years and it makes a big difference.

Here's the one I got, I love it: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B075H39NDL

I keep it on the medium setting for 10 minutes and the rest of the day feels so much better than days where I don't. I can go outside in 0°F and it still feels warm. It totally fixed my energy and motivation issues with SAD.

Here's my Ask HN thread about SAD treatments, for more ideas: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18257011

I switched from a dedicated SAD alarm clock (Lumie Bodyclock Starter 30) to using the wake up routine with a Philips Hue bulb. Such an improvement, maybe because it evenly brightens up the whole room.

I use the cheapest Philips Wake-Up lamp and it works great for me (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00F0W1RIW/). The down side is that the alarm is crappy so I drilled out the piezo speaker with a small drill bit.

Traditional light therapy is 10000 lux for 30 minutes. The earliest research used 2500 lux for 2 hours. If you have Bipolar I the probability of undesirable side effects is much higher and you have to be more cautious with the trio of intensity, duration, and timing window.

A major recent paper on the use of light therapy is the 2013 review by Terman & Terman [1]. If you're mildly scientifically inclined, it's an easy enough read and includes valuable information on determining the optimal timing window for light therapy, which varies (sometimes substantially) from patient to patient, as well as an overview of successful light therapy regimens and the use of melatonin.

(Note on melatonin, from that paper - optimal doses are on the order of 0.2 mg. Pills at the drugstore are usually 3-5 mg, so strong they'd actually further disrupt circadian regulation. Even 0.5mg is usually too much.)

Terman himself authored the main paper exploring the use of dawn simulation as an alternative to traditional lightbox therapy. He too is incensed at the snake oil you're finding: "These findings led to a spate of untested commercial 'dawn alarm clocks' that differ, however, from the clinical trial device ... which [are] easily missed by turning away on the pillow. Such alarm clocks have no demonstrated efficacy." The 'dawn alarm clocks' he is railing against squarely includes such devices as the Philips Wake-Up HF3520 and the Lumie Bodyclock Starter mentioned by other responses here.

In addition to the techniques discussed in Terman's review, the AutoMEQ Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire [2] can help you determine the ideal time window for light therapy.

One way to fight sketchy lux claims is by calculating things yourself. The issue is that lumens is a measure of output, while lux is a measure of received light. Converting between the two requires specifying how the output is spread (ie everywhere/spherically vs more directionally).

The lower calculator here [3] allows you to convert lumens to lux. You can determine the type of bulb used in any reputable light box and you can look up its properties, like lumens, on any decent bulb webstore, e.g. 1000bulbs. Fluorescent especially put out less and less over their lifetime, so the listed 'initial' lumens isn't really appropriate, you want the mean lumens if possible.

For example, my lightbox [4], a reputable one that's been used in clinical trials, claims 10000 lux at 12". So, we calculate: Three 36 W 2g10 bulbs. 2400 lumens (mean) per bulb. Sanity check: 66 lumens/W, nicely within the 60-80 expected [5] range. Now to the calculator - 7200 lumens, 0.3 meters, and we start with a beam angle of 180 (hemispherical). The calculator returns 12732 lux. In other words, yes, this lightbox is capable of hitting 10000 lux at 12", as long as it sends all the energy forward hemispherically, which is a close enough approximation to truth.

Finally, once you're laying out $100 on a therapy lamp, you might as well just drop $13-$17 more [6][7] and get a simple lux meter and then you can be sure of exactly the amount of light received at your retina. I have the second [7] meter and can attest to its ease of use and accuracy. It's also handy to be able to measure after several months of use the light now produced by your fluorescents, so that you can replace them or lengthen your therapy accordingly as they drop.

Oh - one last tip. Depending on your morning routine, you may want to do light therapy at your computer. The 12" distance needed by many lightboxes is very short. I mounted my lightbox onto a vesa monitor arm (just screwed through the back housing) that is installed behind and above my monitor. For my light therapy, I can swing the light into place, and when I'm done I tuck it back out of the way.

1: