Ask HN: Why are airplane touch screens so poor?
I was wondering if anybody with a bit of understanding of touch screens or electronics on-board airplanes would have some insight on why touch screens are so poor on planes. I just flew on Virgin America and while the functionality is steadily improving (wi-fi, google maps, ordering your food in seat), it's still pretty poor and the performance is a joke, especially when you compare to your iPad.
Is the software just crap? Is it the hardware? Is there no financial incentive to improve?
10 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 54.3 ms ] threadThose aren't so great either. I had one in Boston reboot and then freeze on me.
And really, why would advertising companies be motivated to make the hardware cutting-edge? The passenger isn't the customer. The passenger is the product.
So, what you're looking at is the 5 year old state-of-the-art-on-a-budget technology. With that in mind, the rest of it becomes more clear.
They cut costs at every corner, while charging more and more money to fly. That's why its a terrible idea as an investor to put your money into airline companies. Very little chance of long-term return on your investment.
Have we forgotten that decent touchscreens are still pretty new? Ferchrissakes, the first iphone came out in 2007…
http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/design_approvals/air_so...
This just increases the development cycle length. Compare to car nav systems, which also lag behind. Then add the length of the certification process, (even more extreme) conservatism in the industry, installation time (airliner must be taken out of service for a week or two, which is a lot of forgone revenue), etc.
Also, there are power consumption and weight considerations. It may not seem like much for one seat, but multiply by 300 seats in an airliner and it starts be significant.
Add that all up, and it's no longer surprising that the systems are outdated.