Ask HN: Why doesn't Apple solve nuclear fusion?

3 points by nakedrobot2 ↗ HN
They probably have enough money to finance the entire thing themselves.

4 comments

[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 20.0 ms ] thread
I don’t think “do they have enough money for it” is the only factor.
Apple's Corporate Vision Statement

"We believe that we are on the face of the earth to make great products and that’s not changing.

We are constantly focusing on innovating.

We believe in the simple not the complex.

We believe that we need to own and control the primary technologies behind the products that we make, and participate only in markets where we can make a significant contribution.

We believe in saying no to thousands of projects, so that we can really focus on the few that are truly important and meaningful to us.

We believe in deep collaboration and cross-pollination of our groups, which allow us to innovate in a way that others cannot.

And frankly, we don’t settle for anything less than excellence in every group in the company, and we have the self-honesty to admit when we’re wrong and the courage to change.

And I think regardless of who is in what job those values are so embedded in this company that Apple will do extremely well.”

Nuclear fusion isn't in Apple's wheel house and isn't aligned with their expertise.

Because they know marketing, design and electronics, not physics.

Money can be smart or dumb. Apple's money is smart where the company has edge in knowledge and expertise and dumb everywhere else.