Ask HN: Posterous 21.4M views, Tumblr 2.7B. Why?
http://www.quantcast.com/posterous.com
http://www.quantcast.com/tumblr.com
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/tumblr_leaves_posterous_in_the_dust.php
From the RWW article: "Fred Wilson, whose VC firm is an investor in Tumblr, claimed in April that "Tumblr is more of a social network than Posterous." While Posterous would debate that - it too enables users to follow people, comment and re-blog - the mere fact that Tumblr has many more users than Posterous makes it a more powerful social network."
Any ideas on the fundamental reasons Tumblr is crushing it and Posterous isn't?
9 comments
[ 0.27 ms ] story [ 28.7 ms ] threadI'd say design, wording, layout etc. make Tumblr much more hip than the more business-like posterous. Compare their about-pages: http://www.tumblr.com/about (cool), http://posterous.com/about (boring)
I chose Tumblr over posterous, just because it looks like more fun.
I was wondering if there was something deeper to it than just great design - perhaps some kind of special viral loop that tumblr does well that posterous doesn't?
Most Tumblr blogs seem to consist of random photos posted, maybe a song, or a quote. It's content that is very easy to push out there but is different than Twitter.
If you compare it to Posterous, Posterous still feels too much like a regular blogging platform, so they seem to be targeting different markets.
Usually whenever a friend tells me that they want to start a blog, I suggest opting for a Tumblr account because they are going to be more likely to stick with it and post more often because of the nature of the content that works well with it.
I tried to give posterous a shot in the past, but was disappointed. I don't exactly remember why, but it didn't strike me as something I'd want to use.