She forgot to mention the enormous pay check Weinstein lawyer receives for representing him.
Her argument is weak. Her argument is that lawyers have a right to represent any client and should not face social stigma for doing so because these lawyers are just doing their job. What she doesn’t understand is that people also have a right to protest. Her complaining just makes her sound whiny and entitled. And her bringing race into this to help her argument is worst. Him, being the first African American dean, does not matter. Being disliked for representing wrongdoers is literally part of the job - whether he is guilty or not. It’s called having a thick skin.
1 comment
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 9.9 ms ] threadHer argument is weak. Her argument is that lawyers have a right to represent any client and should not face social stigma for doing so because these lawyers are just doing their job. What she doesn’t understand is that people also have a right to protest. Her complaining just makes her sound whiny and entitled. And her bringing race into this to help her argument is worst. Him, being the first African American dean, does not matter. Being disliked for representing wrongdoers is literally part of the job - whether he is guilty or not. It’s called having a thick skin.