I very much agree. Look at it this way: the more we practice and keep our languages truly complex, the longer it will take for machines to take our jobs.
I even take it one step further and actively try to confuse the machines by training my Swiftkey keyboard and Google searches in poor grammar. Take that Skynet!
(No but seriously, I would never equate human and programming languages. They are created for different purposes. PLs are a formalisation of languages, yes. But that is like saying notes are by themselves music. They are, but there is a whole lot more in between there)
No it's not, if you don't know how to code you'll not really fail to execute any receipt you found on web or you'll not fail to create Shopify store and sell your products
To take it a step further, locksmithing should be considered. Mechanical locks are devices which open when given a particular numerical sequence. This doesn't just apply to combination locks but also to keyed locks as keys just represent a predefined numerical sequence through the cuts made into the metal.
6 comments
[ 0.21 ms ] story [ 19.5 ms ] thread(No but seriously, I would never equate human and programming languages. They are created for different purposes. PLs are a formalisation of languages, yes. But that is like saying notes are by themselves music. They are, but there is a whole lot more in between there)
Coding is not equivalent of reading