It is beneficial for real changes to be propagated quickly, but it's irresponsible to use real traffic, so they used a test prefix -- a range of addresses without users.
Trusting / untrusting isn't likely to be the difference between propagating the route in 10 seconds vs 60 seconds. That's not enough time to do anything meaningful trust wise --- either the provider checks the routing dbs and routing PKI or they don't, but a survey of providers that accept or not poor routes is another story.
This article doesn't seem to account for the idea that removed and the announced have a different latency compared to a new announcement. For example if we withdraw a prefix and then announce it 10 minutes later propagation is WAY faster than if we announce a new prefix or withdraw for a few days and then announce again.
3 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 19.2 ms ] threadTrusting / untrusting isn't likely to be the difference between propagating the route in 10 seconds vs 60 seconds. That's not enough time to do anything meaningful trust wise --- either the provider checks the routing dbs and routing PKI or they don't, but a survey of providers that accept or not poor routes is another story.
Edit, but cool article.