So I think you're asking, "why prosecute a victimless crime?"
There's a couple reasons. Some people want the law to uphold societal moral standards. Some say that victimless crimes aren't actually victimless.
- In this case, it's not clear that the male in the video consented to the distribution of the video.
- The video shows a girl who may not legally able to consent to the sex act (The male is presumed to be an adult, but an age was not given in the case).
- She enabled the further distribution of the video by giving it to a friend who passed it on to other students.
> At her initial hearing, the prosecutor said the state was not "trying to prove a point in going forward with this case," but that "the state believes that the respondent is in need of some guidance, rehabilitation for something deeper" and "is just trying to help her."
What mental health issue is at play here? Is the problem that the girl exhibits natural sexual curiosity and behavior? As to her desire to record and share her experience, I wonder where that mentality came from? Could it have something to do with the toxic, social media obsessed culture in which she has grown up?
And it is now the job of the state to provide mental health "guidance" under threat of imprisonment?
It was foolish for her to share the video with her "close friends," but there is nothing criminal or aberrant here. It was not her intent to distribute the video to adults (who I totally agree shouldn't be watching it due to her age).
This prosecution is beyond outrageous, and will leave lifelong scars. She is without a doubt the only true victim here, and the state is the worse for having stooped to this. Hopefully the case is thrown out, and the prosecutors who brought it face severe backlash.
In the US, there is a sentiment that sex which occurs outside of marriage should be punished. Under the magical age of 18? Go to jail. Get pregnant? Spend the next 18+ years caring for a child. Get someone else pregnant? Spend the next 18+ years having your wages garnished.
The cruelty, stupidity, and absurdity of US prosecutors is simply astonishing. And these are the people our society enlists with providing justice. The only thing they're providing is another notch in their belt of absurd prosecutions. It's hard to believe they are even human at all. They are self obsessed monsters and parasites on society.
7 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 29.9 ms ] threadThis is almost certainly why this isn't getting dropped.
There's a couple reasons. Some people want the law to uphold societal moral standards. Some say that victimless crimes aren't actually victimless.
- In this case, it's not clear that the male in the video consented to the distribution of the video.
- The video shows a girl who may not legally able to consent to the sex act (The male is presumed to be an adult, but an age was not given in the case).
- She enabled the further distribution of the video by giving it to a friend who passed it on to other students.
What mental health issue is at play here? Is the problem that the girl exhibits natural sexual curiosity and behavior? As to her desire to record and share her experience, I wonder where that mentality came from? Could it have something to do with the toxic, social media obsessed culture in which she has grown up?
And it is now the job of the state to provide mental health "guidance" under threat of imprisonment?
It was foolish for her to share the video with her "close friends," but there is nothing criminal or aberrant here. It was not her intent to distribute the video to adults (who I totally agree shouldn't be watching it due to her age).
This prosecution is beyond outrageous, and will leave lifelong scars. She is without a doubt the only true victim here, and the state is the worse for having stooped to this. Hopefully the case is thrown out, and the prosecutors who brought it face severe backlash.