Yes, Veep's writers have joked they've had a hard time writing things that would be, well, something you wouldn't find in real life—something completely ridiculous even in the current state of politics. When they're character running for President of the United States rails against Arabic numerals. Snopes actually collected fake or satirical pieces about politicians being against Arabic numerals at least as far back as 2016 it looks like.
I think the point of the survey was to gauge prejudice as opposed to determining if people knew the difference between numbers written in Arabic versus Arabic Numerals (Base 10 number system).
I suspect the biased responses were of the knee-jerk variety, meaning they didn't even have the curiosity to determine what Arabic numerals actually meant.
I think the point of the survey was to write an inflammatory article picking on ignorant Americans.
"numbers written in Arabic" is the same as "Arabic Numerals" because that's what "Arabic Numerals" means to Americans without any additional context. We don't have an everyday term for western-style numbers, but you can draw context for "X Numerials" from "Roman Numerals" which clearly indicates a different character set for representing numerical values.
Inflammatory? Nobody forced them to answer "no" even if they ignorantly didn't know that numeric digits are called Arabic numerals. You cannot argue in good faith that the pool didn't expose intolerance.
I can't see any argument for denying the teaching of anything outside of falsehoods. Teaching is supposed to be about learning something new, typically outside your comfort zone.
What you seem to be missing is the average person does not call them "Arabic numerals." Additionally, it's 100% valid to call numbers written in Arabic characters "Arabic numerals." We can't draw any conclusion from this survey, but despite this, the author decides to make all sorts of inferences. Because this survey appears to be entirely useless on the face of it, I think it was designed especially for some sort of confirmation-bias rather than testing an actual hypothesis.
Show me the corresponding survey for "Japanese Numerals" and then we can have an actual discussion. While you're at it, show me the survey for non-Americans asked the same question.
For what? There's no utility for learning Japanese characters for most Americans. I can come up with a very long list of things people should know how to read before I get to foreign-language character sets.
The term most certainly isn't ambiguous, if anything it's very specific. Now the question itself being frivolous because it neglects to state that Arabic numbers are the worldwide numerical standard today is debatable, but the intent was to see the bias against the word Arabic.
Yeah, yeah, a bunch of Americans are ignorant xenophobes, we know.
But just to add, I much prefer the term "Hindu-Arabic" as it gives proper credit to both the creators and influencers of the numeral system (specifically, thinking of zero as a number in itself, and as a digit).
It's fairly reasonable for someone who doesn't know the term 'arabic numbers' to assume that he's asked about style of number writing as currently practiced in the arabic countries.
16 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 39.9 ms ] threadhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embMAtagQiU
So, this article is frivolous.
I suspect the biased responses were of the knee-jerk variety, meaning they didn't even have the curiosity to determine what Arabic numerals actually meant.
"numbers written in Arabic" is the same as "Arabic Numerals" because that's what "Arabic Numerals" means to Americans without any additional context. We don't have an everyday term for western-style numbers, but you can draw context for "X Numerials" from "Roman Numerals" which clearly indicates a different character set for representing numerical values.
I can't see any argument for denying the teaching of anything outside of falsehoods. Teaching is supposed to be about learning something new, typically outside your comfort zone.
Show me the corresponding survey for "Japanese Numerals" and then we can have an actual discussion. While you're at it, show me the survey for non-Americans asked the same question.
But you are insisting on ignoring the point entirely. Had the question been about "Japanese Numerals" the answer should still have been "YES!"
But just to add, I much prefer the term "Hindu-Arabic" as it gives proper credit to both the creators and influencers of the numeral system (specifically, thinking of zero as a number in itself, and as a digit).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu%E2%80%93Arabic_numeral...
Incorrect. Arabs write numbers left to right.
http://www.rahmahmuslimhomeschool.co.uk/index/wp-content/upl...
It's fairly reasonable for someone who doesn't know the term 'arabic numbers' to assume that he's asked about style of number writing as currently practiced in the arabic countries.