> On his Twitter bio, Bright states that he is “Poly/pan/pervy.”
At least the first two are benign and none of anybody else’s business with people of the right age and consent. But the actions and descriptions in the complaint are truly despicable.
I’d always considered Peter Bright as the Ars “Windows and browser stats” guy. I now wonder what would happen to all the articles he’s written on Ars over the years.
6 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 24.3 ms ] threadPhysiognomy is real. Also he defines himself on Twitter as "Poly/pan/pervy" so there's that.
At least the first two are benign and none of anybody else’s business with people of the right age and consent. But the actions and descriptions in the complaint are truly despicable.
I’d always considered Peter Bright as the Ars “Windows and browser stats” guy. I now wonder what would happen to all the articles he’s written on Ars over the years.
I think his ArsTechnica articles will be preserved.
I hope the vile stuff [1] he wrote about president Trump, will be forgotten, however.
He has not been proven guilty though, so may be will see him clear his name.
[1] https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2019/06/07/anti-trump-tech-re...