It does. Could probably make it a little more clear by having the tail of the q a bit more curved, but it's clear enough now I think.
I'm not sure I like the contrast between the fat outline on the Q and the outline-less rest. The shadow looks a bit too pronounced to me.
Overall I like the top one best, though I'd try a few in-betweens, because I like the idea of the bottom one, I just think that one obscures the b too much.
Without knowing what the product is it's hard to tell. Typographically the first seems better but it's marginal.
I can gleam that it might be something to do with communication as the Q looks like a speech bubble but it also looks like a penguin looking down (centre hole of the Q is it's eye).
In general I would say they look garish and amateurish.
Having said that, they are fine, get on with making the product, I'm sure you've got more important things to cover.
7 comments
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 25.2 ms ] threadMaybe use the second one with the b a little bit further out from under the Q and then make bix all the same colour.
By the way, does the Q look like a chat bubble to you at all?
I'm not sure I like the contrast between the fat outline on the Q and the outline-less rest. The shadow looks a bit too pronounced to me.
Overall I like the top one best, though I'd try a few in-betweens, because I like the idea of the bottom one, I just think that one obscures the b too much.
The basic logo design is good, but it looks like you then turned on every photoshop effect (gradient, color overlay, bezel, etc...).
Less is more.
I can gleam that it might be something to do with communication as the Q looks like a speech bubble but it also looks like a penguin looking down (centre hole of the Q is it's eye).
In general I would say they look garish and amateurish.
Having said that, they are fine, get on with making the product, I'm sure you've got more important things to cover.